Hey all.
I'm re-entering the hobby after an 8 year break and am currently setting up a 90 gal reef with a 30 gal refugium/sump. I was flipping through my copy of Delbeek and Sprung's "The Reef Aquarium" and came across this passage:
They say that they don't know much about it, and that they would be cautious about using it since it could leach toxic compounds, but then they back off of that, noting that major aquariums have had success.
Have any of you tried anything like this? Foam would certainly be a less expensive, more reef-friendly material than natural reef rock. It could even be kept mostly out of sight behind a facade of real live rock. It would also provide a cleaner refugium if macro-algae would attach to it.
Thoughts?
-Alec
I'm re-entering the hobby after an 8 year break and am currently setting up a 90 gal reef with a 30 gal refugium/sump. I was flipping through my copy of Delbeek and Sprung's "The Reef Aquarium" and came across this passage:
Some large public and private reef aquariums in Europe have very little limestone rock at all in them. What looks like rock in these tanks is actually a polyurethane foam substance which has been shaped to look like rock. The surface is apparently very attractive to coralline algae which rapidly colonize it, making it virtually indistinguishable from the "real McCoy."
They say that they don't know much about it, and that they would be cautious about using it since it could leach toxic compounds, but then they back off of that, noting that major aquariums have had success.
Have any of you tried anything like this? Foam would certainly be a less expensive, more reef-friendly material than natural reef rock. It could even be kept mostly out of sight behind a facade of real live rock. It would also provide a cleaner refugium if macro-algae would attach to it.
Thoughts?
-Alec