Pregnant mollies

All6Fish

New member
I have 4 mollies in my reef tank to enhance the cycling and it appears one of them is pregnant, the are all doing great in the tank happy as clams you might say. My intentions were to cycle the tank then return them to the LFS . She seems tobe laying on the bottom tonight, do you think she's ready?
 
I have 4 mollies in my reef tank to enhance the cycling and it appears one of them is pregnant, the are all doing great in the tank happy as clams you might say. My intentions were to cycle the tank then return them to the LFS . She seems tobe laying on the bottom tonight, do you think she's ready?

Don't use fish for cycling. Take them back to the store while they have a chance.
 
Please read up on how to cycle a tank..this is a cruel practice IMO and can so easily be avoided..take them back as stated above while they still have a chance to survive..
 
I am in week 6 of the cycle, they are in no danger at this point. They will return to the LFS happy and healthy. Guess my question was, with her laying on the bottom is she near releasing her fry?
 
Yes it is probably ready, since their gestation period is about 3-4 weeks, baby Mollies are highy susceptible to filters & powerheads. Mollies can live & thrive in saltwater, so don't worry about people giving you grief, 6 weeks is a lot longer than most new people wait.
 
Yes it is probably ready, since their gestation period is about 3-4 weeks, baby Mollies are highy susceptible to filters & powerheads. Mollies can live & thrive in saltwater, so don't worry about people giving you grief, 6 weeks is a lot longer than most new people wait.

If you consider someone saying that using living animals to cycle a tank is giving someone grief you should rethink that statement. He may be in week six now..but when did he add them? There are so many other ways to cycle a tank that there is no reason to put fish in there for that purpose..
 
Or you can just leave them in your tank and the fry will become live food for the carnivores in your tank.
 
If you consider someone saying that using living animals to cycle a tank is giving someone grief you should rethink that statement. He may be in week six now..but when did he add them? There are so many other ways to cycle a tank that there is no reason to put fish in there for that purpose..

Rethink using "cruel practice" to describe using fish to cycle a tank, the OP said they were fat & happy, that's how us cavemen used to cycle our tanks & nobody complained about it, in fact the complaints came later when it was impossible to get rid of those Damsels. Pick your fights wisely, this one is not worthy.
 
Funny that you consider that picking a fight..:lolspin:

You are right, it's just varying opinions. I don't advocate starting a cycle this way but I also wouldn't describe it as a cruel practice that someone deliberately subjected a fish to.
 
I used 5 molly's and a 3 striped damsel. 2 molly's dies, another had 3 babies, but the damsel ate them all. Its not cruel, they were already acclimated to salt water. and the lfs said it would help cycle the tank.
 
I used 5 molly's and a 3 striped damsel. 2 molly's dies, another had 3 babies, but the damsel ate them all. Its not cruel, they were already acclimated to salt water. and the lfs said it would help cycle the tank.

I think what Ohiomom is referring to as cruel is the fish having to go through the ammonia and nitrite spikes in order to cycle your tank, not the mollies being in saltwater. It is not healthy and in the best interest for their well being for them to be subjected to any ammonia or nitrite.

Regardless, you already know how most people think on the subject of live fish cycling so I'll leave my opinion out of it. Good luck with your tank :)
 
Wow, I guess I'll choose my questions more carefully. All my fish are alive and well, I am a life long Martial artist by trade and live by the rules of modern day samurai.....all life is to be respected. Please just breathe.
 
My ammonia and nitrates never spiked, so no harm, no foul!

then your tank didnt cycle....


^^^ +3... what they said. :)

Not True! You don't HAVE to see an ammonia & nitrite spike for your tank to cycle. This is absolutely false.

The reason most people see ammonia or nitrite spike is because they are far exceeding their tanks ability to process waste. This can be because: A) There is no biological filtration to start with (perhaps you started with all dry rock). Or B) Because the waste they are producing is FAR exceeding the ability of the tank to process it. Both things will cause a spike in ammonia, which most people associate with the tank being cycled.

For example, people will usually throw a shrimp in the tank and let it rot. The rotting shrimp FAR exceeds the systems ability to biologically process that much waste, which causes a spike in ammonia. This is why we remove our fish when they die, to ensure they don't cause an ammonia spike that will crash our tanks. It's the same principal. The rotting dead fish would far exceed our tanks ability to process ammonia waste (unless it's very large and very established tank) which is why we remove the fish. Normal tanks will never see the kind of bio load that a rotting shrimp will produce.

As the shrimp rots, it produces a HUGE amount of ammonia which will far exceed the current biological filtration of the system which causes the spike in ammonia. The bacteria multiply slower than the ammonia is produced, so there is a lag time, and thus excess ammonia is detected. If you only feed a small amount of food everyday to start the cycle, then you aren't exceeding the ability of the system to biologically process excess waste, which means you'll never see a spike in ammonia. This DOES NOT mean the tank isn't cycled.

If you use a lot of high quality-cured live rock, or you just feed "phantom fish" with a flake or two of food everyday, then there is a very good chance you won't see a spike in ammonia or nitrite. Just because you didn't see a spike in ammonia, doesn't mean your tank didn't cycle! It only means that your current biological filtration is plenty sufficient to process all the ammonia waste that's being produced. If that's the case, you should take advantage of that, and put fish into the tank - NOT FIVE, but a small fish or two will ensure there is waste being produced to sustain the system. It's a CYCLE and there always needs to be an input of waste (ammonia) to sustain it. If not the bacteria will die and the capacity of your tank to process waste will decline.
 
Thanks for the input, the 4 molles I do have are doing great.

LOL!! Good show.

Be careful, though. When I started my first saltwater tank 20 years ago, I used freshwater and freshwater mollies, then slowly increased salinity. I started with 6 mollies. By the time I was done, I had probably 3 dozen!! LOL!

Anyhow, too much PC going on in here. I eat fish. I fry 'em, saute 'em, marinade and pickle them. They probably got caught live, then, frozen alive. When I go fishing, I clean and gut the fish I catch when they are still alive. Cycling your tank with fish seems a lot more benign than those other choices. BTW, I also throw live lobster into boiling water. Tastes better that way.
 
Back
Top