RE: UV lighting?

Seen that Phil... what a steal.

I don't really care for the units with wipers though since they tend to leak over time. I know you can replace the seals, but it's just one more thing to have to worry about.
 
A 57W for about $160 or so total, would be a great price and should be a workable setup for a pretty large tank. You could always replace the wiper seal at the same time you change bulbs, that would probably eliminate the leak problem.
 
I've never used a JBJ and have no idea on their effectiveness. I did have Jebo 18W on my 75 for about a year or so which I think did ok for killing bacteria and the like at a low flow but I don't think it was large enough based only on the information that thread Mike posted to have a major impact on sequestering phosphates.

poo-tang: I've used acrylic baffles in my glass sump without problem. You will just need more silicone; probably more than you want to use but after almost three years in my sump I cut the silicone with a razor blade and still wrestle the baffles out when I pulled the sump out of service. I think I had about 3/16"-1/4" on either side of the baffle.
 
So for a 60w you think I am needing something much much much larger then 9w eh? O) Who am I kidding you have a bagilion watts on your 75! haha
 
dunno, I have no real idea if they are as effective as people think they are. I do know that I have had no issues with ich in my tank since I started using UV. Phosphate is another matter. Since it is pretty hard to measure I don't really know if my UV works well as I hope it does. I still use GFO and grow chaeto and run a oversized skimmer too. If I had a colorometer I might experiment with turning it off for a while then turning it back on to see if I could measure a difference.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12103036#post12103036 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Aquaticman74
I'd grab a 25w AquaUV for your 60g.

Damn thats about twice as much as I wanted to spend and probably 3x larger.Not to mention I need to get 1200gph going through that thing, thats 2x the size of my return pump alone! haha
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12103055#post12103055 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ppurcell
dunno, I have no real idea if they are as effective as people think they are. I do know that I have had no issues with ich in my tank since I started using UV. Phosphate is another matter. Since it is pretty hard to measure I don't really know if my UV works well as I hope it does. I still use GFO and grow chaeto and run a oversized skimmer too. If I had a colorometer I might experiment with turning it off for a while then turning it back on to see if I could measure a difference.

I remember reading that the UV lamp loses half of its output fairly quickly, so I am sure you want an over sized unit.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12103062#post12103062 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by sellout007
Damn thats about twice as much as I wanted to spend and probably 3x larger.Not to mention I need to get 1200gph going through that thing, thats 2x the size of my return pump alone! haha

400gph tops Slow is better. ;)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12103110#post12103110 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Aquaticman74
400gph tops Slow is better. ;)

Yeah, but thats a lot less flow! haha Thats going to nuke everything that passes through it. ha

Even so thats another huge pump I have to try and find room for. I don't want it running after my fuge, so I need to fit that pump into my first chamber with my skimmer.

Maybe I will hold off on this one and just run ozone.
 
can you run these on the drain side, via gravity? possibly tee off and put a vavle on the outlet side of the UV, so you can choke back and control the flow thru it? that could be just the solution u need Dan.
 
Back
Top