Do you think that you can have a better thriving reef tank without fish in there or are they essential for anything such as bacteria or anything. I am assuming that there are negative effects to a reef tank from the bioload caused by the fish
its not that unusal for reef tanks full of corals to lack fish, ive seen photos of some and comments by aquarists, they do have cuc though, most are very light loaded anyhow, i cant see it being a problem at all
If you think you would like that approach you could stock your tank very lightly with only fish that serve some sort of purpose. i.e. a tang or lawn mower blenny to help with algae, a cooperband incase of aptasia, and a yellow coris wrasse to help with SPS pests. I personally love having a wide variety of fish and as long as you are committed to staying on top of your water changes you wouldn't have a problem stocking a tank that was aimed towards having thriving corals.
When I moved the last fish out of my small tank, I left the tank running for about 2 months. During that time, the health of the coral declined dramatically. I was not feeding anything, but continued doing the same water changes as before.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.