gloup81
New member
Hello guys im glad im back after 9 years of absence
my plan is to have in my bedroom not a reef but rather a rockpool in a 50cm ~15g display tank and a smaller one standing beside the display to act as refuge/sump conected with a simple U shape 1 inch pvc pipe ( remenance of my box overflow ) ill be having a 300lph and a ~1000lph pump wheres the small one will be on 24/7 and the big one in daytime
ive done the initial tests and works really good but havent tested it in real life situation where microbubbles will acumulate overtime in the overflow pipe , what are the things i should be worried about what are any potential pitfalls for this kind of scheme ?
ill be supporting the u shape overflow with a herbie one which it want be as big so to act as a pure emergency system where all the return pumps will be workin but rather for surface skimming in daily intervals , the opening/hole of the inside of the herbie will be sitting just above the water lvl and it will be triggered when i put an extra pump forcing more water from the sump to the display tank thus raising the water lvl
what i havent thouight of ? what i do miss out ?
the u shape pvc pipe has worked in my system 5years and never failed even if it was suckin whole big bubbles due to the tubulance generated in the inside box but in the box it could get a water lvl difernce great enough to force the acumulating bubbles out of the pipe , i was keepin an eye over it for many months when i initially plumped it and it was always keepin an equilibrium of trapped air inside the hose and the raised flow it was produced
i need more testing , i need to see what happens if i manually instert pockets of air in the overflow , the height diference is way less than what can be achiaved in a box inside the tank so i suspect ill have to go with much lower water lvl that what originally thought , u see on the testin runned the system 2 days with the water lvl of the display tank on the lip of the glass and the sump's lvl was about 3 cm's less , that means the pressure inside the tube is not as big , i tested out a 1,5 inch u pipe and there the pressure is almost absence , i could moove 4k litres in a system less than 60litres and the height diference was less than 1cm , and thats not good since im intending to acumulate the debrits in the sump so to remoove it as easy as possible , with no pressure in the tube the debrits that tent to sit fast may get to the intake of the overflow but cannot do the travel and get back in the tank again thus the 1.5 inch acts counteractive as decrits acumulator / filter
maybe i still need an inside box after all ? or bumb the overall flow from ~1300lph to 2000+( bigger height diference more pressure inside the pipe less trapped air ? but sure less water volume overall
ok guys i done some " write n think " thingy here , i hope my thoughts translated in a language which i dont speak very well ( trust me i sound much worse than what i write ) make a sense to you , if u got anything to say apart that i need to stop murdering english plz input it . it will be much appriciated
my plan is to have in my bedroom not a reef but rather a rockpool in a 50cm ~15g display tank and a smaller one standing beside the display to act as refuge/sump conected with a simple U shape 1 inch pvc pipe ( remenance of my box overflow ) ill be having a 300lph and a ~1000lph pump wheres the small one will be on 24/7 and the big one in daytime
ive done the initial tests and works really good but havent tested it in real life situation where microbubbles will acumulate overtime in the overflow pipe , what are the things i should be worried about what are any potential pitfalls for this kind of scheme ?
ill be supporting the u shape overflow with a herbie one which it want be as big so to act as a pure emergency system where all the return pumps will be workin but rather for surface skimming in daily intervals , the opening/hole of the inside of the herbie will be sitting just above the water lvl and it will be triggered when i put an extra pump forcing more water from the sump to the display tank thus raising the water lvl
what i havent thouight of ? what i do miss out ?
the u shape pvc pipe has worked in my system 5years and never failed even if it was suckin whole big bubbles due to the tubulance generated in the inside box but in the box it could get a water lvl difernce great enough to force the acumulating bubbles out of the pipe , i was keepin an eye over it for many months when i initially plumped it and it was always keepin an equilibrium of trapped air inside the hose and the raised flow it was produced
i need more testing , i need to see what happens if i manually instert pockets of air in the overflow , the height diference is way less than what can be achiaved in a box inside the tank so i suspect ill have to go with much lower water lvl that what originally thought , u see on the testin runned the system 2 days with the water lvl of the display tank on the lip of the glass and the sump's lvl was about 3 cm's less , that means the pressure inside the tube is not as big , i tested out a 1,5 inch u pipe and there the pressure is almost absence , i could moove 4k litres in a system less than 60litres and the height diference was less than 1cm , and thats not good since im intending to acumulate the debrits in the sump so to remoove it as easy as possible , with no pressure in the tube the debrits that tent to sit fast may get to the intake of the overflow but cannot do the travel and get back in the tank again thus the 1.5 inch acts counteractive as decrits acumulator / filter
maybe i still need an inside box after all ? or bumb the overall flow from ~1300lph to 2000+( bigger height diference more pressure inside the pipe less trapped air ? but sure less water volume overall
ok guys i done some " write n think " thingy here , i hope my thoughts translated in a language which i dont speak very well ( trust me i sound much worse than what i write ) make a sense to you , if u got anything to say apart that i need to stop murdering english plz input it . it will be much appriciated
Last edited: