So you have tried this then Onemanband? How exactly did the foam on the taller tube know not to go up there and only go up the shorter one? Please help me understand. Your comments of fact are suspect to my mind. If one level of foam is falling over a ledge, then the second level is at the same height right (gravity)? Ok, so where does the foam in the second tube go? Does it break down and disolve back in to solution only to go up that shorter tube? The last time I checked , most skimmer designs intend the water and foam to exit at different places.
Gravity does not effect a dry foam as noticably as either water or wet faom. I understand you are adamant as to this not working . Why? What evidence do you have of this? Your understanding of foam and gravity may be different than mine, and I would like to hear more than you have stated so far. I am not trying to pick a fight I am trying to get answers to my question from people who have them. Your answer was not satisfactory enough to me to cause my dropping of this line of reasoning.
To All : I ask again , perhaps more clearly this time :
If a skimmer were built with two foam riser pipes,
-and the entrance to each pipe was at the same height on the skimmer body,
-and one pipe was 3/4 " - 3.5 " taller than the other( made variable to match the pump/skimmer),
-and the water flow-through was cotrolled by a hartford loop and a gate valve,
-and each cup was water tight at its juctio to the foam riser
Why would the foam in the taller side not continue to build and stabilize at the point of height where it breaks over the edge on the shorter side, and continue to build up into a dry foam exiting into the cup as it stacks up enough?
If I am missing a fundamental principle of skimming here please let me know?
if you or anyone you know has tried this, please chime in. I am not dead set on this working, I am dead set on finding out if it will or not. Thak you for all your time and ANY comments you make. I realize it was unfair of me to request no opinions. I am sorry if my tone earlier , I just want reasoning given behind the NO.