Skimmer Poll, opinions, and fun.

Skimmer Poll, opinions, and fun.

  • Euro Reef

    Votes: 3 6.8%
  • Octopus

    Votes: 8 18.2%
  • Bubble King

    Votes: 2 4.5%
  • Tunze

    Votes: 1 2.3%
  • ASM

    Votes: 6 13.6%
  • AquaC

    Votes: 4 9.1%
  • Coralife

    Votes: 3 6.8%
  • DAS

    Votes: 2 4.5%
  • Other

    Votes: 15 34.1%

  • Total voters
    44
so a recirculating design is better then. i take it there is a seperate pump that puts the water into the skimmer? or does water from the overflow drain into it somehow?

(Im still using a HOB style skimmer, but its in sump so i do not know to much about other skimmers.)

On a side note, that is a huge skimmer, and wow i can buy a car for that price.. :P
 
You can either use a separate feed pump, or gravity feed from a drain. I have one of my drains split and a 3/4" hose feeding the skimmer. A valve on the outlet is constricted to set the water level inside the skimmer body. I think I run about 300g/hour through the skimmer, a little more than the tank's volume every hour.
 
Picture of my drain setup, the smaller hose feeds into the skimmer
new_plumbing.jpg
 
Last edited:
imo a skimmer for a 75g and 210g will be very different, but im gonna go ahead and recommend what i have, an Octo NW200. Stock form it will be overkill for a 75, as i know it is for my 92 and honestly i should have got the NW150. The good thing is that its less than $200 and every one and there mother had modified this thing and stuck it on 200g+ systems with good results.
 
I've been saying to people to buy Matt (ding2thedong)'s DNW-200 and recirc it. By itself it would be perfect for a 75, and then if you recirc mod it, mesh mod it, and if you really want to go nuts and add a second recirc pump, it would really be a cranking skimmer. And he's selling it for cheap too...
 
Back
Top