<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12433968#post12433968 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by silverwolf72
Last I saw they were comparing it to a 400W 20K bulb, which has a lot less output compared to a 10K. As far as heat they produce the same amount, it's just concentrated on the back of the LED and has to be heat sinked away, so it would not make your room run any cooler than any other comparable light source.
20K does have less par but one of the reasons people sacrifice par is the need not to have actinics along with the associated cost. Most people I know that run 10k also run actinics so that variable should come into play when comparing mh/led. So, side by side I would compare 20k 400mh with the latest led straight up. If I were to compare 10k mh with led I would include the cost of actinics with the mh. Seems to me that having the heat directed away from the tank should keep the tank temp lower, as opposed to the direct heat of mh. For the record I'm not sold on led's yet but the AI version does have me interested.