<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6382614#post6382614 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by gatohoser
Ya that sounds like another really strong reason not to remove the polycarbonate then.
Barryhc, don't forget that the tropical sun is much stronger than our northern hemisphere sun anyways though. I don't remember how it works but when you think about water absorbing light its halfs for every certain fraction of the total distance it can travel. So maybe after like 3" its 1/4 of what it is at the surface. And corals can take that directly.
We do agree though. You probably shouldn't take that lens off. I just don't think that the problem is that you would get UV over-radiation.
That depends on the "collection factor" for one thing, and you have to decide if you believe that 2 times the amount of "natural" sunlight can be pumped into the tank with "skylight collectors". I am stating that it can. Sola Tubes can only get about 50% the value "natural sunlight into the tank. If you don't believe this, then that is a point of contention, but elsewise "think about it".
Secondly, water depth "degrades" light penetration through several mechanisms, you are right about that, but it is not degraded by 75% in three inches, 25% in 6 to 12" of depth would be a lot closer.
We will get less light in upper latitudes, because of "photoperiod", and because of "inclination angle". Aside from some reduction that occurs in regard to inclination angle, as a function of how much light "skips off" the atmosphere, the proper collection of light in higher latitudes can be rather effecient. Photoperiod reductions are about 33% VS "summer" in the midnorthern latitudes. Inclination angle losses can be even more severe, IF methods are not utilized to mitigate these losses.
So, probably not much concern with too much UV radiation with Sola tubes only, but watch out for running MH, or Skylight collectors without UV lenses.
Happy Reef Keeping! > barryhc
