Switching to VHO.

venom00viper

In Memoriam
Hey I was considering switching to VHO/T5 lighting set up. Right now I have a 2x250 MH 14k set up. I would like to know some of the pros and cons of either. I don't my light to determine what I can't keep as far as sps and lps down the road. If any has any deals on a setup I'd be interested. I look forward to the imput. Thanks!

-ben
 
I'd recommend going new on a vho setup... a couple of workhorse ballasts, an endcap kit, with whatever bulbs you decide... look up Andyr45 , he's got a gorgeous vho tank. He could tell you what he's using, and I will tell you right now, it works. He's been doing some sps, has a really cool color to his tank, everything is growing like crazy. Awesome setup, it was my favorite from the tank hop that year.
 
I chose T5s because of the energy efficiency. Much less heat means no chiller needed as well. No glitter lines though, just bright, uniform light. My SPS frags are doing fine in a 90 with the Current USA 8x54w fixture. The ones with individual reflectors are brighter, though.
 
If you are concerned about what corals you may be able to keep in the future,then I would stick with the MH set up you have.If anything,I would maybe consider adding some VHO actinic bulbs for supplemental lighting.HTH
 
Re: Switching to VHO.

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11294443#post11294443 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by venom00viper
Hey I was considering switching to VHO/T5 lighting set up. Right now I have a 2x250 MH 14k set up. I would like to know some of the pros and cons of either. I don't my light to determine what I can't keep as far as sps and lps down the road. If any has any deals on a setup I'd be interested. I look forward to the imput. Thanks!

-ben

Why would you want to go from MH to VHO or T5 ? You already have MH and can keep anything you might want or need down the road.

Is it color you're looking for?

It would be helpful if you post what is it you're trying to accomplish.

djfrankie
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11296774#post11296774 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by 45commando
If you are concerned about what corals you may be able to keep in the future,then I would stick with the MH set up you have.If anything,I would maybe consider adding some VHO actinic bulbs for supplemental lighting.HTH
ditto
 
OK I am simply looking for a change. Dont have alot of money. I would like to cut down on the heat. The size of these bulbs and reflectors take up my whole canopy. I dunno how much less energy the T5 uses versus the MH. But my power bill is 150 in a 1bdr condo. I wouldn't mind trying to get a electronic ballast to run hqi bulbs. they don't take up much space. Then I would have room to run some actinics. any opinions appreciated. Thanks!

-ben
 
An electric ballast shouldn't take up any more space than an HQI, but it will be more energy efficient. But what $$$ are you going to save by switching ballasts? Probably not much.

The most energy efficient thing I've seen recently is if you buy 175w ballasts and run the 175w Ushio or Iwasaki 14 or 15k, I forget which of which, but whatever it was, it put out as much PAR as most 250w bulbs. Granted, the bulb costs $100, and you would need new ballasts, but it'll save money I suppose.

I've been trying to get a firm answer from people about saving energy by switching to T5, and the answer I keep getting is that a watt is a watt, 8x54w for 48" tubes is going to be 424w, or 2x250w will be 500w, so you could go with 4x54w for a big savings, but it depends on your tank depth, depends on what corals you want to keep, etc.

I would go as far to say that as long as the tank is shallower than 24", you would be good to go with T5s with single reflectors (IceCap SLRs or Tek). I would say 8 bulbs for a 24" wide tank, 12-18" you could get away with 4 bulbs. It's all about you and your corals though.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11299005#post11299005 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ReefWreak
I've been trying to get a firm answer from people about saving energy by switching to T5, and the answer I keep getting is that a watt is a watt, 8x54w for 48" tubes is going to be 424w, or 2x250w will be 500w, so you could go with 4x54w for a big savings, but it depends on your tank depth, depends on what corals you want to keep, etc.

Exactly. I will stick with MH just because you already have them. Also consider replacing costs (2) MH bulbs compared to (8) T5 bulbs...the equivalent wattage in your case.

You mention HEAT is the problem. How are you cooling your system now?

djfrankie
 
Forgot to add.

Use reefcentral's electrical calculator to see your savings from one option to another.

HTH,
djfrankie
 
Your MH lights are they retro fit or a fixture.....
I would be interested in buying your MH lights.
I am geting a 90g tank set-up that comes with T-5's
bit I prefer the shimmer of the MH lights
 
yeah they are a retro diy kit I got form a guy in orlando. They work great. Not pretty but does the job. I want to put HQI then in my canopy. they take up much less space than me huge mogul and reflectors I got now. I would be interested in selling the set up or trade for a dual 175 hqi setup. I have found one retro kit for about what mine would sell for. any one interested let me know. Thanks!

-ben
 
the Iwasaki 15k is the 175w bulb your talking about, I run it and I love it.

By the way 175w bulbs are SE only so i think that means that there is no 175w hqi ballast?, and the Iwasaki bulbs i believe run better on magnetic ballasts anyway. google the iwasaki bulbs and look ofr the article that compares the bulb performance on different ballasts for a definitive answer
 
well right now I have magnetic 2x250 ballasts. Would probably like to change to a dual hqi 150 and then some t5 actinics. thoughts?

-ben
 
Back
Top