matt the fiddler
New member
So, I am purchasing a house this week (yippie) which means since I am not renting I get to start the long process of planning my BIG at least 120 gallon tank
possible SPS, Tangs, and Anthias...
I am trying to figure out a size for a tank, and I am torn between both 120 sizes, 150, and the 6 foot 180.
Cost wise, I already have all the rock, lights, skimmer, CA Reactor, Neilson, circulation, etc. to drive any of them. This is all left from my older overengineered BB 75 gallon that crashed from Aquacontroller CPU meltdown....
I already am planning on a pretty big sump... so there will be a substantial water volume regardless...
SO my question for those that have run big systems in the past... is the big jump in operational cost when the tank goes from 4-6 feet... or is it a linear function of volume? Initially, if the 180 has the same lights as the 120, and the circulation issue is taken care with similiar watts- would you be closer to the running costs of a 6 foot 120?
My thoughts are... going the 180
Tank cost would be more
Water changes would be more..
Power would be the same (for the way I would run it)
Heat would be equal or less, with more volume to diffuse the same .
Bio Capacity/ territory would be higher
tank could take more $$ to not look empty.
Anyone else want to chime in?

I am trying to figure out a size for a tank, and I am torn between both 120 sizes, 150, and the 6 foot 180.
Cost wise, I already have all the rock, lights, skimmer, CA Reactor, Neilson, circulation, etc. to drive any of them. This is all left from my older overengineered BB 75 gallon that crashed from Aquacontroller CPU meltdown....
I already am planning on a pretty big sump... so there will be a substantial water volume regardless...
SO my question for those that have run big systems in the past... is the big jump in operational cost when the tank goes from 4-6 feet... or is it a linear function of volume? Initially, if the 180 has the same lights as the 120, and the circulation issue is taken care with similiar watts- would you be closer to the running costs of a 6 foot 120?
My thoughts are... going the 180
Tank cost would be more
Water changes would be more..
Power would be the same (for the way I would run it)
Heat would be equal or less, with more volume to diffuse the same .
Bio Capacity/ territory would be higher
tank could take more $$ to not look empty.
Anyone else want to chime in?