The Great Barrier Reef is not doing well.

Outlook "poor" for Great Barrier Reef: study By Rob Taylor Rob Taylor "“ Wed Sep 2, 1:22 am ET

CANBERRA (Reuters) "“ Australia's Great Barrier Reef, the world's largest living organism, is under grave threat from climate warming and coastal development, and its prospects of survival are "poor," a major new report found on Wednesday.

While the World Heritage-protected site, which sprawls for more than 345,000 square km (133,000 sq miles) off Australia's east coast, is in a better position than most other reefs globally, the risk of its destruction was mounting.

"Even with the recent management initiatives to improve resilience, the overall outlook for the Great Barrier Reef is poor and catastrophic damage to the ecosystem may not be averted," a government reef management body said in the report.

The five-yearly reef outlook report, aimed at benchmarking the health of the reef, found climate change, declining water quality from coastal runoff, development and illegal fishing were the biggest dangers to the reef.

The study echoed findings by scientists belonging to the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that the Great Barrier Reef could be "functionally extinct" within decades, with deadly coral bleaching likely to be an annual occurrence by 2030.

The reef was one of the most diverse and remarkable ecosystems in the world, and populations of almost all marine species were still large, the government's Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority said in the report.

But some ecologically important species, such as dugongs, marine turtles, seabirds, black teatfish and some sharks had declined significantly, while coral diseases and pest outbreaks like crown-of-thorns starfish appeared to be increasing and becoming more serious.

CHALLENGE AHEAD

A separate report by the Australian Institute of Marine Science, also released on Wednesday, found ocean temperatures on northern parts of the reef had been a degree above average through winter, pointing to a bad year for coral bleaching.

"We know that a failure to act on dangerous climate change puts at risk significant places like the Great Barrier Reef and this report confirms the scale of the challenge ahead," Australia's Environment Minister Peter Garrett said.

Bleaching occurs when the tiny plant-like coral organisms die, often because of higher temperatures, and leave behind only a white limestone reef skeleton.

Garrett and Queensland state Premier Anna Bligh unveiled a plan to improve water quality on the reef. It followed a report last year which found agricultural run-off was killing the reef, with some sections already irreversibly damaged.

The plan aimed to halve the runoff of harmful nutrients and pesticides by 2013 and ensure 80 percent of agricultural enterprises and 50 percent of grazing operations were taking steps to reduce runoff.

The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) said the report added urgency to a debate in Australia's parliament on laws to curb carbon emissions, rejected last month by the upper house Senate and due for a second vote in mid-November.

"We cannot sit back and let the world's largest and most iconic reef system die on our watch," said WWF reef campaigner Nick Heath.

(Editing by Robert Birsel)
 
Truely sad to hear that little by little we are finishing off all of these beautiful creations.
 
so something that has been through multiple ice ages is going to just suddenly die off? need to take studies like this with a grain of salt. alot of researchers remarkably find that they're studies support the agenda they are working for, and that more money is needed to continue to study what they are working on.
 
I don't think the Great Barrier Reef in its current state has been around for an ice age. The fauna of reefs has changed dramatically over the history of the region. Older reefs are barely recognizable as such from the fossil record. That was a big issue for the debate over Darwin's theory of the formation of the reefs of the Pacific.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15639244#post15639244 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by skanderson
so something that has been through multiple ice ages is going to just suddenly die off? need to take studies like this with a grain of salt. alot of researchers remarkably find that they're studies support the agenda they are working for, and that more money is needed to continue to study what they are working on.

+1. No body has proven that global warmer is a mere fact or simply the universe going through it normal cycle. Need more than one article/scientist to convince me imho.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15639244#post15639244 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by skanderson
so something that has been through multiple ice ages is going to just suddenly die off? need to take studies like this with a grain of salt. alot of researchers remarkably find that they're studies support the agenda they are working for, and that more money is needed to continue to study what they are working on.

It's not change aka multiple ice ages that are the problem. It's the rate of change. Ice ages don't appear over night, organisms are generally given the chance to adapt to new conditions over long periods of time. Effluent run-off from agriculture on the geological scale have essentially occurred instantaneously.

One could adopt the view that it doesn't really matter. Mass extinctions have occurred in the past - often due to sudden changes caused by nature i.e. volcanic eruptions, meteor impacts etc and life bounces back in different forms. The Dinosaurs lucked out before they were able to develop into intelligent life forms capable of perhaps surviving the natural event that wiped them out. Mammals have been a bit luckier in that regard, but we may have a bitter pill to swallow by being the sowers of our own destruction.

Even if climate change due to man-made influences is for real, there are no doubt a host of organisms in the back ground whose day in the sun is fast approaching. Nature doesn't care about beauty in the greater scheme of things and if the great barrier reef ends up covered in something we don't find aesthetic, the only losers are us...

The real question is do we wish to preserve things as they are and if so are we prepared to take the chance that the actual data - (not the man made climate change hypothesis) is a part of a natural cycle that we cannot change or is caused by man and is therefore preventable?

Although oil may run out in 50 years or so, there's enough coal to kept the man made carbon cycle running for hundreds of years.

And no I'm not a Greenie, just a long time lurker who finally registered today to be able to search for a solution to a low ph problem in a mates 350 gallon tank he left me in charge of while on holiday!
 
ijwilson,

welcome.gif

To Reef Central

Randy goes into details regrading low pH problems in this article:

Low pH: Causes and Cures
http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-09/rhf/index.htm

Low pH is usually due to high CO2 levels in the house.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Great Barrier Reef Bleached:

news-graphics-2007-_443175a.jpg


gbr_bleaching4_img_pmarshal.jpg


C2b1_Latistella-stand-bleached.png
 
Last edited:
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15703681#post15703681 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by HighlandReefer
ijwilson,

welcome.gif

To Reef Central

Randy goes into details regrading low pH problems in this article:
Low pH: Causes and Cures
http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-09/rhf/index.htm

Low pH is usually due to high CO2 levels in the house.


Thanks for the welcome! Scary, Randy's article was the one I read after a bit of general googling. In his case the tank is an in wall job, that is in a room that is separate from the rest of the house, so not caused by house levels, more likely it's a part of the cycling process since it's only 6 - 8 weeks old. No fish and just a few corals. The PH according to his young son had dipped into the high 6's but when I checked today was at 7.9 (PH probe). Decided not to do anything although some lime water may be needed.

Initial setup photo. It's now covered with hair aglae and has a few soft corals and SPS frags.

P1020517.jpg



In a previous life, pic doesn't do it justice. Vid here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TV1TvbV3zc

P1010905.jpg
 
What a beautiful planted discus tank. ;)

One of the best ways to increase the pH a bit is to use kalk water to maintain the alk (and calcium) with. As long as your pH remains between 7.8 - 8.5 your are fine.
 
At this point, it's more than one scientist who thinks the world is warming. That's a general consensus of atmospheric researchers.
 
Back
Top