exsequor
New member
I think I had a change of heart. I was originally planning on running my 150g as a aggresive fowlr, but I have intended to do some coral regardless, because I have 4 reef tanks right now, and plenty of frags.
So I know what I'm getting into. Currently I'm running a few small refugiums, but after looking at the Aqueon 4's "skimmer compartment" it's horrible. No thanks.
The eshopps still seems reasonable, however a good refugium is out of the question.
Which leaves me with...Trigger Systems ruby 36... for $90 more I get a sump with a ACTUAL skimmer compartment, an ACTUAL refugium compartment, and an ACTUAL probe / media compartment (for live rock rubble, carbon, etc).
It now seems stupid to consider the eshopps, even if i'm not going to be running a super reef, even a few larger coral specimens mixed in with a triggerfish, and some other larger, aggressive fish mixed in, it seems silly to not have a refugium and to be limited by the eshopps.
I'm thinking if I knew for a fact I was just going to do fowlr, I'd just go with the eshopps rs-300, but since I have a lot of coral growing, thus "free" frags for myself, I'm sure I'll do some corals in there, and then I'd probably regret not spending the extra money on the Trigger systems sump. Money isn't too much of a factor on this. I don't want to spend more then $400 on a sump. But $260 vs $280 vs $354 isn't a big difference in my book. I guess by that logic $454 isn't "too bad" for adjustable water height throughout, but nah, I believe a trigger systems regular ruby 36 would go above and beyond my needs. Which would be better then buying a near $300 sump such as a eshopps or proflex and being limited, and basically throwing my money away???:?
So I know what I'm getting into. Currently I'm running a few small refugiums, but after looking at the Aqueon 4's "skimmer compartment" it's horrible. No thanks.
The eshopps still seems reasonable, however a good refugium is out of the question.
Which leaves me with...Trigger Systems ruby 36... for $90 more I get a sump with a ACTUAL skimmer compartment, an ACTUAL refugium compartment, and an ACTUAL probe / media compartment (for live rock rubble, carbon, etc).
It now seems stupid to consider the eshopps, even if i'm not going to be running a super reef, even a few larger coral specimens mixed in with a triggerfish, and some other larger, aggressive fish mixed in, it seems silly to not have a refugium and to be limited by the eshopps.
I'm thinking if I knew for a fact I was just going to do fowlr, I'd just go with the eshopps rs-300, but since I have a lot of coral growing, thus "free" frags for myself, I'm sure I'll do some corals in there, and then I'd probably regret not spending the extra money on the Trigger systems sump. Money isn't too much of a factor on this. I don't want to spend more then $400 on a sump. But $260 vs $280 vs $354 isn't a big difference in my book. I guess by that logic $454 isn't "too bad" for adjustable water height throughout, but nah, I believe a trigger systems regular ruby 36 would go above and beyond my needs. Which would be better then buying a near $300 sump such as a eshopps or proflex and being limited, and basically throwing my money away???:?