<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13139897#post13139897 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by shiveley
why not just use a bulkhead? doesn't seem work the risk to try a uniseal when bulkheads are tried and true.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13140185#post13140185 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by buck50bmg
I use them and love them. I have them in my water change system and will use them on my next Ca reactor I build
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13140198#post13140198 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by buck50bmg
Oh yea, 33 ft (1 ATM) of seawater is just 14.7psi.
If your talking about ASM "uniseals" then yes, but the real Uniseal is built alot.....alot better.<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13141441#post13141441 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Kaos
I would worry about them developing leaks over time. Awhile back I read where some (I emphasize some) were having trouble w/ skimmers that had uni-seals developing a slow drip type leak. To me it's not worth the risk. I like setting up a system w/ the intentions of it lasting the next 30 years. Will it have to, highly doubtful (unless your PaulB), but it's nice to have that assurance. Especially when your talking about enough water to ruin your carpet/wood floors, subfloor, and structure. JMHO.