Volcano club

IMG_2243.jpg
[/IMG]

I know this is gross but this is some of the sludge I pull out on a daily basis. I f I go a few days(which I normally do) I can get enough to fill 2 measuring cupfuls. I have found that it is the easiest just to go in and grab the stuff out. It doesn't really rinse down because it's so thick. It's like cake mix that you wouldn't want to bake with!:p
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12917334#post12917334 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by skey44
i see a utility sink next to energy's

He probably has an underground septic system just for the skimmer and then has a truck come empty it once a month.....:lol:
 
this is my 1875 after 2 weeks.not really pulling much out ,does anyone know how long of a break in i should expect? i am still running 1 of the 2 g-6 that i was using. should i retire it?

50164S7301431.JPG




50164S7301433.JPG

50164S7301432.JPG
 
I see part of your problem ... you're using white sch40 pipe on the output ... :lol: :rollface: :strooper: :mixed: :lol:
 
He does have a website but it sucks. He is in the procees of updating it and making it easy to use. I know he was so busy he didn't have time to work on the website. Hopefully a new one will be available soon.

I have some info on his skimmers and would be glad to help out if anyone wants details.

The media reactors aren't available. I happened to be driving by his shop one day and stopped in. I saw the prototype and was really impressed. The design is remarkable.
 
saleencobra- initially I took a handful of that nasty skimmate and coated the inside of my skimmer to speed up the break in process. Furthermore how much is the other skimmers pulling out? Multiple Skimmers on the same system compete with each other instead of complement. This may lenghten your break in period.

That 1875 is a great skimmer. It looks like its working right, bubble density is good, water height looked right, so it's a matter of break in and pulling the other skimmers off.

Also you won't get the thick gunky crap I get with a wet neck. My skimmer automatically dumps down my sink(waste collector). How is yours set-up? Do you have the ability to monitor the amount of waste?

One last thing- what do you feed and how often? Certain foods will frequently shut down a skimmer. Mine does every night immediately after feeding and doesn't start up for 3-4 hours. I believe selcon and zoecon have complexes which do this. Any food that leaves a residue will do this. Therefore if you feed often you could limit the production.
 
Am I misrepresenting my new skimmer by calling it a Volcano?? I got it from Mary (MFATWORK) over at TCMAS. I picked it up under the assumption it was an "early-build" or "proto-type" Volcano skimmer. I off loaded my BM200 for this "Volcano".

Can someone comment if I bought an early build Volcano??

It is HERE

Or here is a picture:

IMG_0028.jpg
 
It is and I have seen that one in person. The design is completely different now. That unit is similar to the H & S or other ineffiecent skimmers out there (no offense). All those pumps suck up a lot of watts, that's why he changed the design and went with a single pump and a handcrafted needlewheel. Which means yes the same guy made it but it's a completely different unit than what he currently produces. If you like those mutliple pump skimmers than that unit is good. Remember the quality and craftsmanship is still there because Spazz built it, so you have that going for it. You have his early cone style neck and his twistlock as well. That also looks like it was built before he did the testing and found out that bigger necks produce better results since you have a normal sized riser cone.

Now he ovesizes the necks coming off the riser cone as well. This keeps the bubbles from contacting a hard surface and popping which re-releases the proteins back into the wate column. With a wider neck the bubbles join together and keep the proteins in suspension until they can be dumped into the collection cup. You would be surprised at how big a difference this little known fact can make.

I need peoples opinions on something. There are these new all cone shaped skimmers called ATB skimmers hitting the market in europe and starting to become popular here as well.
It seems that people don't realize the major flaw in that design. The problem is in the cone.
This is my opinion from what I have seen:
A cone is great,awesome,spectacular when it is placed in the right area of the skimmer. A completely cone shaped design actually decreases eficiency because it increase the speed at which the bubbles rise by directing them upward. This decreases the dwell time or the contact time that the bubbles are able to stay in the main reaction. The bubbles are forced into the collection cup to quickly to pick up the proteins in the water column.
Ideally a skimmer needs a circular reaction chamber with a gentle downward force to keep the bubbles inside the reaction chamber the longest time possible to collect the most proteins. This is called "Dwell Time" and is immensly important to increase the efficiency of a skimmer. The reaction chamber or main body of the skimer needs to be as large around as possible. Ideally you don't want the bubbles touching the sides of the skimmer where they could burst and release the proteins they collected. In a perfect world the bubbles would not encounter any solid surface -only other bubbles. (Skinny, tall skimmers are bad) As the bubbles collect these proteins they rise to the surface. At the top of the skimmer you want a cone shaped neck with no flanges or other solid obstacles that could collect the bubbles, which may make them caveatate or join together into larger bubbles. This makes them lose the proteins they have gathered.
Only at the top of the skimmer do you want a cone shape with as large a neck as possible. This will quickly push the protein enladen bubbles into the collection cup.
 
Back
Top