What Is Your Favorite Nfl Team Poll
- Thread starter drew55
- Start date
- Status
Lord Voldemort
New member
Hate bears even if I am a chicagoan. Close tie for colts and seahawks for me. AND the Seahawks are the NFC champs 
ronkent
Premium Member
This from a pm from drew55
HOW DARE I BOO THE PACK
WHAT ARE YOU CRYING ABOUT IT, WHAT KIND OF STUPID NAME IS THE PACKERS, YOU PUT STUFF IN BOXES OOO''' REAL SCARRY.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you afraid to speak your mind in public? So lets look a little deeper here. Your on a high horse because they won the division last year right? Do you realize since 1996 they have only had 2 winning seasons? DO you realize that the Bears haven't been to the superbowl since 1986(which they won) and it's the only trip they have ever taken to the big game? Now lets look at the other side. Green Bay. In the past 15 years, GB has had 1....count em...1 losing season. The packers have also been to 4 Superbowls, won 3 of them, the last Superbowl visit being 1998 when they lost to Denver. All i have to say about that
Edit: Oh yeah, grow up and stop acting like your 10. Unless you really are 10.
HOW DARE I BOO THE PACK
WHAT ARE YOU CRYING ABOUT IT, WHAT KIND OF STUPID NAME IS THE PACKERS, YOU PUT STUFF IN BOXES OOO''' REAL SCARRY.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you afraid to speak your mind in public? So lets look a little deeper here. Your on a high horse because they won the division last year right? Do you realize since 1996 they have only had 2 winning seasons? DO you realize that the Bears haven't been to the superbowl since 1986(which they won) and it's the only trip they have ever taken to the big game? Now lets look at the other side. Green Bay. In the past 15 years, GB has had 1....count em...1 losing season. The packers have also been to 4 Superbowls, won 3 of them, the last Superbowl visit being 1998 when they lost to Denver. All i have to say about that
Edit: Oh yeah, grow up and stop acting like your 10. Unless you really are 10.
o ya
o ya
Who cares the bears might have only won one super bowle but they won two championships before the superbowl was ever invented. Also the bears have more players in the hall of fame than any other team. SO maybe the bears havent been the best team in the past ten years but the Packers have had there dry spouts to and there about to have another. Also the bears have like 3 0r 4 of the 12 linebackers in the hall of fame also.
Brett Favre led the leage in intereceptions now whos so great. While Kyle Orton only through 13 interceptions in the 15 games he played Brett Favre through 29 interceptions in 16 games. Also the fourth round Rookie quarterback vs. the veteran and so called super hero Kyle Ortons TD to INT ration was higher than Brett Favre.
o ya
Who cares the bears might have only won one super bowle but they won two championships before the superbowl was ever invented. Also the bears have more players in the hall of fame than any other team. SO maybe the bears havent been the best team in the past ten years but the Packers have had there dry spouts to and there about to have another. Also the bears have like 3 0r 4 of the 12 linebackers in the hall of fame also.
Brett Favre led the leage in intereceptions now whos so great. While Kyle Orton only through 13 interceptions in the 15 games he played Brett Favre through 29 interceptions in 16 games. Also the fourth round Rookie quarterback vs. the veteran and so called super hero Kyle Ortons TD to INT ration was higher than Brett Favre.
I am also not on a high horse
I am also not on a high horse
I am not on a high horse, the bears are awsome and always will be. You Packers fans on the other hand think your Americas team and your so great because you one the first Superbowl, also the packers colors look like throw up.
I am also not on a high horse
I am not on a high horse, the bears are awsome and always will be. You Packers fans on the other hand think your Americas team and your so great because you one the first Superbowl, also the packers colors look like throw up.
ronkent
Premium Member
Ok so now we are comparing quarterbacks...Why not bring out all the stats?
Kyle Orton: 368 passing attempts, 190 completions, thats a 56.1 completion rate, 1869 passing yards, 5.08 yards per attempt, 54yds longest throw, 9 TD's, 13 INT, 23 passes at 20+yards, 3 passes at 40+ yards, Passer rating 59.7
Brett Favre: 607 passing attempts, 372 completions, thats a 61.3 completion rate, 3881 passing yards, 6.39 yards per attempt, 59yds longest throw, 20 TD's, 29 INT, 40 passes at 20+yards, 7 passes at 40+ yards, Passer rating 70.9
You see, I can't stand people like you who throw up incomplete stats to make your player(or entire team) look better. Everyone who has been watching football for any length of time know you can not base a quarterbacks preformance on INT and TD alone. You have to look at the whole picture. But you seem young, you will learn overtime. And like every INT is always the quarterbacks fault. Maybe his line let someone through and he got hit as he pssed the ball. Thats Football 101 man.
Edit: Oh don't worry, I was busy typing schooling you. You don't need to PM me to come reply to your post. Thats what the email notification is for!
Kyle Orton: 368 passing attempts, 190 completions, thats a 56.1 completion rate, 1869 passing yards, 5.08 yards per attempt, 54yds longest throw, 9 TD's, 13 INT, 23 passes at 20+yards, 3 passes at 40+ yards, Passer rating 59.7
Brett Favre: 607 passing attempts, 372 completions, thats a 61.3 completion rate, 3881 passing yards, 6.39 yards per attempt, 59yds longest throw, 20 TD's, 29 INT, 40 passes at 20+yards, 7 passes at 40+ yards, Passer rating 70.9
You see, I can't stand people like you who throw up incomplete stats to make your player(or entire team) look better. Everyone who has been watching football for any length of time know you can not base a quarterbacks preformance on INT and TD alone. You have to look at the whole picture. But you seem young, you will learn overtime. And like every INT is always the quarterbacks fault. Maybe his line let someone through and he got hit as he pssed the ball. Thats Football 101 man.
Edit: Oh don't worry, I was busy typing schooling you. You don't need to PM me to come reply to your post. Thats what the email notification is for!
ronkent
Premium Member
Re: Re: An actually im 16 not 10
Re: Re: An actually im 16 not 10
He is never gonna win this. I've been watching football probably 3 times longer than he has.
Edit: And for the record i am originally from VA so i'm not officially a cheesehead. Always like the Pack though
Edit#2: Oh yea...his response that Chicago had championships befor there was a superbowl...well guess what so did GB:
Most NFL Championships: Green Bay Packers 12, Chicago Bears 9, New York Giants 6, Dallas Cowboys 5, San Francisco 49ers 5, Washington Redskins 5, Cleveland Browns 4, Detroit Lions 4, Pittsburgh Steelers 4. <-----thats since the beginning.
How ya liking those stats buddy.
Re: Re: An actually im 16 not 10
He is never gonna win this. I've been watching football probably 3 times longer than he has.
Edit: And for the record i am originally from VA so i'm not officially a cheesehead. Always like the Pack though
Edit#2: Oh yea...his response that Chicago had championships befor there was a superbowl...well guess what so did GB:
Most NFL Championships: Green Bay Packers 12, Chicago Bears 9, New York Giants 6, Dallas Cowboys 5, San Francisco 49ers 5, Washington Redskins 5, Cleveland Browns 4, Detroit Lions 4, Pittsburgh Steelers 4. <-----thats since the beginning.
How ya liking those stats buddy.
fine
fine
if your gona say that some interceptions arnt bretts fault then neither were some of Ortons because I can remember a few passes that would bounce off some of the receivers hands and right into the other teams hands. Also maybe you do have to look at some of the other stats or maybe not like when orton only through for 70 yards one game and they still won there for yards dont matter. All the matters is wining and he got that done, and the two biggest factors determining a winner is TD and INT.
fine
if your gona say that some interceptions arnt bretts fault then neither were some of Ortons because I can remember a few passes that would bounce off some of the receivers hands and right into the other teams hands. Also maybe you do have to look at some of the other stats or maybe not like when orton only through for 70 yards one game and they still won there for yards dont matter. All the matters is wining and he got that done, and the two biggest factors determining a winner is TD and INT.
ronkent
Premium Member
Re: I am also not on a high horse
Re: I am also not on a high horse
Actually no. We are just some of the most loyal fans around the NFL. I remember watching many Bears games when they wer on losing seasons and the stadium is over half empty. Ever see Lambeau Field empty? I dont think so. And for the record, Dallas has always been known as America's team.
Re: I am also not on a high horse
Actually no. We are just some of the most loyal fans around the NFL. I remember watching many Bears games when they wer on losing seasons and the stadium is over half empty. Ever see Lambeau Field empty? I dont think so. And for the record, Dallas has always been known as America's team.
ronkent
Premium Member
Your the one that through up the quarterback half-stats. I was just showing you thats only half the story. And i never said that all of Ortons INT's were his fault. Your grasping at straws dude because you cant win this battle. Just face it man, historically the Packers have always been better than the Bears.
ronkent
Premium Member
Yeah and it was probably 10below and no chance to win. You probably would have left too. O wait. You probably have never been to a Bears game. And so you have seen 1 game where stands were half empty. I have seen many many Bears games like that...o wait...they were half empty from the beginning of the game.
Im grasping at straws
Im grasping at straws
What straws am i grasping at I dont see any. Also what battle was I loosing definatly not this one you only said that because you felt you were loosing just like the packers. What was there record 4 and 12 but it should have been 3 and 13 but the seahawks gave them one at the very end playing there third string. Also the Bears would have finished 12 and 4 but they lost to the Vikings because they put in there 3rd stringers and they would have had a division sweep.
Im grasping at straws
What straws am i grasping at I dont see any. Also what battle was I loosing definatly not this one you only said that because you felt you were loosing just like the packers. What was there record 4 and 12 but it should have been 3 and 13 but the seahawks gave them one at the very end playing there third string. Also the Bears would have finished 12 and 4 but they lost to the Vikings because they put in there 3rd stringers and they would have had a division sweep.
ronkent
Premium Member
dood they have had 1 losing season in 15 years!!!! how many losing seasons has the bears had in the last 15 years. Your talking about the bears 1 good season as of late. The pack has had 1 losing seson as of late.
Edit: after looking...the bears hve had 10 losing seasons in the past 15 2 of them being 4-12 seasons.
Edit: after looking...the bears hve had 10 losing seasons in the past 15 2 of them being 4-12 seasons.
Actually they put grossman in
Actually they put grossman in
they actually put grossman in because they had no tape on him nobody could study him, also Grossman is better than Orton no efence to the guy who was a "ROOKY" so cut him some slack. He did get the job done not because he only through 70 yards but because he didnt make the mistake of turning it over like brett favre thats why the bears won so many and the packers lost so many because of the turnovers. he realy didnt do good, but he did do good by not doing bad like throwing interceptions like most rookies would do.
Actually they put grossman in
they actually put grossman in because they had no tape on him nobody could study him, also Grossman is better than Orton no efence to the guy who was a "ROOKY" so cut him some slack. He did get the job done not because he only through 70 yards but because he didnt make the mistake of turning it over like brett favre thats why the bears won so many and the packers lost so many because of the turnovers. he realy didnt do good, but he did do good by not doing bad like throwing interceptions like most rookies would do.
- Status
