phurst
Richmond Reefer
So, I've been watching all the hype over ULNS for the last year or more here online as well as in my local reef club. My question is, why would I want to take the next step to ULNS? I'm definitely not bashing those using this method, as surely there are some very beautiful ULNS tanks out there. There are also some very attractive non ULNS tanks out there. I'm using the 'old school' method of SSB, cheato fuge, water changes. I have a 150g SPS display, 30g sump, 15g frag tank, 10g fuge. Color looks good to me, and growth is good. I typicaly have about 5PPM nitrates, and phosphates show up as '0' on my mostly useless API kit. I've never invested in any kind of low range kit or meter, because I don't have any algae issues, and these cheap kits do fine for me. If I had issues, I might be more inclined to get pinpoint accuracy in my testing. I run GFO and GAC in reactors, I have a good skimmer, and that's about it. Yeah, I get film algae on the glass that requires scraping every few days, but beyond that, there's no algae in the DT or frag tank.
Now, I know what some of you are going to say: "If you're happy with it, then don't change anything". True enough, but like the rest of you, I'm always looking for a way to make things just a little better. So, is ULNS the way? Is it worth all the trouble for the result you get? Admittedly, I haven't looked into it extensively, but it seems like a lot of added work/expense to do the daily dosing, addition of AAs and other coral foods, boosting the fish population, testing, testing, testing, strict maintenance of what I would consider moderate alk levels, dealing with possible bacterial blooms, and the general work and paranoia with what seems to be, running your tank on the razors edge of disaster. So, what's the word? Those of you that made the switch. Was it worth it? Did you do it in order to combat some issue you were having? Are you happy with the results? Is it worth all the work? If I'm generally happy with my tank, is it something I should consider?
Now, I know what some of you are going to say: "If you're happy with it, then don't change anything". True enough, but like the rest of you, I'm always looking for a way to make things just a little better. So, is ULNS the way? Is it worth all the trouble for the result you get? Admittedly, I haven't looked into it extensively, but it seems like a lot of added work/expense to do the daily dosing, addition of AAs and other coral foods, boosting the fish population, testing, testing, testing, strict maintenance of what I would consider moderate alk levels, dealing with possible bacterial blooms, and the general work and paranoia with what seems to be, running your tank on the razors edge of disaster. So, what's the word? Those of you that made the switch. Was it worth it? Did you do it in order to combat some issue you were having? Are you happy with the results? Is it worth all the work? If I'm generally happy with my tank, is it something I should consider?