Apparently, a non-infringement assessment someone had their patent attorney prepare has been circulated freely, including here on RC (at least partially). As could easily have been predicted, Maxspect has just this week revised their pending claims to eliminate the "loopholes" identified in the non-infringement assessment and has requested that their application be republished with the claims as so revised. In other words, they are seeking to establish provisional rights based on their "cleaned up" claims.
Word to the wise: if you come into possession of any further non-infringement positions, you should keep it confidential.
(Note: I have not been engaged by any party in connection with this matter. This is just a general word to the wise and does not constitute legal advice, per se.)
Word to the wise: if you come into possession of any further non-infringement positions, you should keep it confidential.
(Note: I have not been engaged by any party in connection with this matter. This is just a general word to the wise and does not constitute legal advice, per se.)
