Floyd R Turbo
Either busy or sleeping
IMO you're splitting hairs. Plus I think that it is irrelevant what you put in the tank, the tank should be built to withstand the maximum water column that could be placed in the tank with no other factors, this is how the tank calculators "work". They also do not consider many other relevant factors but those who make these calculators refuse to address these concerns, likely for some liability reasons. Such factors and potential reasons are discussed in this thread if you search it.
Just because there is 2" of sand and then 2" of water on top of it does not mean that the water head is 2" - it is still 4". They hydrostatic pressure of 2" of water above 2" of sand is not very dissimilar to 4" of water with no sand.
The composition of the sand bed or absence of it should be relatively meaningless for our purposes. In the entirety of this thread, this is the first I have heard anyone mention it. Consider the absence of a sand bed and the fact that no one fills their tank full to the brim to be either cancelling each other out of just an additional safety factor, either way it needs not be considered, really.
Just because there is 2" of sand and then 2" of water on top of it does not mean that the water head is 2" - it is still 4". They hydrostatic pressure of 2" of water above 2" of sand is not very dissimilar to 4" of water with no sand.
The composition of the sand bed or absence of it should be relatively meaningless for our purposes. In the entirety of this thread, this is the first I have heard anyone mention it. Consider the absence of a sand bed and the fact that no one fills their tank full to the brim to be either cancelling each other out of just an additional safety factor, either way it needs not be considered, really.