<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10425811#post10425811 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by petes97
I think you misunderstood my intent. It is always the best choice to do the math and understand how a product will interact with your environment. I would never use the "suggestion" of a vendor outright without additional research to size a component for my aquarium.
I don't want to start a war, but I would like to request an sources you have suggesting that running a chiller less to extract the same number of BTUs (or heat) will contribute less heat into the surrounding air. I am willing to concede the point with evidence, but it doesn't mesh with "my" understanding of heat transfer.
My understanding of heat transfer is that the heat in the air is directly proportional to the amount of heat extracted from the water. So, if I understand the physics, the heat transfer to the air is going to be roughly the same regardless of the size of the chiller, with the exception of super oversizing or undersizing, due to mechanical heat exchange.
One could argue so many points regarding chillers. While it would appear to be best to run a chiller for only a short period of time repeatedly, you need to take into consideration the wear an tear on the device and the temperature fluctuation in the tank (depending on your tolerances).
Again, noise has a relationship to size, but also to quality. I've found noise is all over the place, so demo a chiller first.
Anyway, I've fired of an email on this very topic to a NASA HVAC engineer I know and I'll post his response when I get it.