I do understand your point and I have read that article as well. In that article did they state that the one who lived longer than two years was placed in a tank 6 months old and the others were placed in tanks under 6 months old? If it did I must have missed that paragraph because I thought the point of the article was something different. To me that article says how difficult it can be to raise anemones long term and how captivity is so bad for them, not when to place an anemone in the tank. I mean if I we want to listen to the story of that article they don't think anyone should have one in captivity. They thought it was cruel and inhuman to raise them in captivity since no person has ever out lived the anemones in the wild that reach ages in the hundreds.
Are you taking yours back to the ocean now since you can't care for it for 200 years? We all may be totally wrong in having them but we are trying to save the one he has, that is my point.
Are you taking yours back to the ocean now since you can't care for it for 200 years? We all may be totally wrong in having them but we are trying to save the one he has, that is my point.
