hahnmeister
In Memoriam
Re: DIY Plans?
Re: DIY Plans?
Thats the million dollar question. I think the cone design, and 'stacking' the bubbles like this is a possible alternative to having a tall column of water w/ bubbles flowing up as far as dwell time is concerned. Rather than having the bubbles freely rising through the water, they instead get 'stacked' in the body/neck waiting in the head longer rather than in the cylinder. Is it better? I dont know and cant say. In my case it sure is.
This skimmer is what I will use for now, as it appears to work the best with my system. In my case, I know my other half is glad to have the big ugly recirc skimmer next to the tank gone, so I dont think Ill be setting up the 5' tall skimmer other than to see how it works in comparison. I will still make the 'tall column' skimmer to compare... so I dont know what to say. I really havent come to any conclusions right now other than this thing is outperforming my 30" tall, 8" diameter 1200lph of air, overflow fed recirc skimmer by far.
What have I learned, or what may I 'borrow'? The cone shape is pretty wicked and so any time the opportunity comes up, a transition neck with a very steep angle would be better than less of an angle. It seems to disrupt the bubbles as they rise alot less. Will it change my plans for the 5' tall one? Not really, as they are different beasts all together.
Re: DIY Plans?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11177516#post11177516 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by pjf
Hahn,
You had plans for building a tall low-turbulence counter-current skimmer with a wetneck and recirculating pump. Have your plans changed as a result of the ATB? Are you confident that your DIY skimmer will out-skim the ATB? If you are still planning to proceed with DIY skimmer plans, what design concepts will you borrow from the ATB?
A penny for your thoughts.
Thats the million dollar question. I think the cone design, and 'stacking' the bubbles like this is a possible alternative to having a tall column of water w/ bubbles flowing up as far as dwell time is concerned. Rather than having the bubbles freely rising through the water, they instead get 'stacked' in the body/neck waiting in the head longer rather than in the cylinder. Is it better? I dont know and cant say. In my case it sure is.
This skimmer is what I will use for now, as it appears to work the best with my system. In my case, I know my other half is glad to have the big ugly recirc skimmer next to the tank gone, so I dont think Ill be setting up the 5' tall skimmer other than to see how it works in comparison. I will still make the 'tall column' skimmer to compare... so I dont know what to say. I really havent come to any conclusions right now other than this thing is outperforming my 30" tall, 8" diameter 1200lph of air, overflow fed recirc skimmer by far.
What have I learned, or what may I 'borrow'? The cone shape is pretty wicked and so any time the opportunity comes up, a transition neck with a very steep angle would be better than less of an angle. It seems to disrupt the bubbles as they rise alot less. Will it change my plans for the 5' tall one? Not really, as they are different beasts all together.