<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7755626#post7755626 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by djian
Ben, After seeing your house today. My opinon would be to have a false wall in the front that you can remove. It will make life so much easier to have the ability to get to the tank from the front. Just a simple thing as auqascaping will be dramaticly easier from the front. Coral placement will also be easier and less frustrating.
Hey Ian,
Thanks for coming by and for your thoughts. I'm mostly interested in not having the false front because I can't figure out a way to make it look seamless, like a plain, white, drywall.

I imagine if I had a lot of decorative stuff on my walls it would be easier to make it "fit in." I also have to deal with sound-proofing it and waterproofing it, though those could certainly be done.
One thing to keep in mind is that the greater depth a tank like this provides means that, naturally, I'll be putting the "decor" farther back from the front. I actually think more of the aquascaping will have to be done from the back than the front simply because I won't be able to stand at the front panel and reach very far back! I don't have a good plan (or even a vision of a plan) for how best to lay it out yet, but I suspect this will often be the case.
Have you checked out oregonreef.com? This is one example of a very similarly-sized tank where there is no front access, and he thinks it works out fine. I think his motive was also aesthetic -- no holes in the front wall, in other words.
Finally, there is a structural concern that will prevent me from making much open space above the tank anyway, and this is because that wall is load-bearing. It has to have something like a 12-inch header placed above the tank to handle the load from the loft above, and that would reduce my working space to about 96 - 32 - 30 - 12 = ... 22 inches. Not impossible to work in, but not spacious, either.
I'm keeping an open mind, but I'm actually more confident about this than I am about the second point you raised, which was...
Flow: Make life easier on yourself and decide what corals you are keeping first. We never discuss this so I am unsure. But if you go stonie, you will want massive flow. 30-50x would be sufficiant. Powerheads are great, but you will get sick of looking at them. I recomend ocean motion on a closed loop. That will give you great random flow.
I'll definitely keep stonies and softies, so flow will be important. I'm concerned that the closed loops offer several disadvantages:
1. Higher power consumption per unit flow
2. More points of failure (holes in tank, plumbing)
3. One mechanical single point-of-failure (one pump vs many powerheads)
4. Lower flexibility once installed
I think my biggest fear is probably just psychological: I don't have a good instinct for where flow should come from, so I can't design for it in terms of holes in the tank. It seems "risky" to me to try to guess up front. I like the idea of being able to experiment and move things around.
The Vortech pumps really cut down on the visual distractions in the tank. I actually think a really good tank draws the eye away from the pumps anyway, so I'm not that worried about perfection here. But I really like the idea of high-efficiency, modular, movable flow. (I don't like that they don't have a solution for 1-inch acrylic yet, and they also don't have a way to put the things at any angle but 90.)
My mind's not made up, though, so feel free to keep the thoughts coming.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Ben