This has been an interesting test yielding some results that initially had me scratching my head. Here's what I observed...
- The 2-liter bubble trap works perfectly. The few micro-bubbles that initially escaped disappeared completely after a few days once a slime coat developed on the bottle. For those that want to go "Sans sock", it's a great solution.
- At first glance, my water test results were confusing. Even though "visibly" the water quality had degraded with large amounts of suspended debris and detritus - Initial and post test water quality tests were unchanged (within my testing limits using API) No detectable Po3, No3 - Ca=420, dKh=10. Even stranger - ORP has increased from an average of 280, to over 300 (and still climbing.)
- There was a LOT of sediment on all horizontal surfaces (as RT indicated.) The maintenance required to blast all the rocks in the DT and racks in the FT at least weekly would be more time consuming than simply swapping out a filter sock. Even so, the skimmer didn't seem to capture much of it. I think over time, this alone would have driven me back to the filter sock.
- SPS showed significant increases in PE BUT the Z & Ps were struggling (even lost a few new ones that were a bit weak to begin with.)
- Even stranger, Chaeto which had been rocking (despite no measurable phosphates) quickly began to whither. At present pace, it would be totally dead w/i a week. The small amount of hair algae in my systems (sump weirs and a few frags in the frag tank) has turned white and died - All in conflict with what I expected from an increased nutrient environment, especially since I had just cleaned my skimmer prior to this test resulting in a couple of days of no skimmate.
So this seemingly higher nutrient environment was acting more like a ULN system...then I figured it out.
About a week prior to this test, I began adding vinegar to my ATO/Kalk (300ml per 10 tsp Kalk/5 Gal RO/DI) to increase the Ca saturation and slightly lower the pH so I can keep up with evaporation (works great by the way.) One of the additional benefits of this (depending on dosing levels) is that it provides a Carbon source for beneficial bacteria (in the form of Acetate ions.)
I deduce that the addition on the carbon source and resulting increased "good" bacteria out-competed the algae resulted in the whithering of all algae in the system and likely skewed the water test results toward the positive.
I have decided to replace the filter sock and accept the weekly maintenance. As my system in heavy SPS (70+ pieces) I don't want to take any chances. I believe it would have surely resulted in a degradation in water quality over time. I may try a mesh sock instead of the felt, to see what if any impact is derived from allowing "some" smaller particles to remain.
Of course your results may vary but I'm glad I tried this - At least now I KNOW that for me, the benefits from the filter sock outweigh the additional maintenance.