Calcium Reactors vs 2 part??

AquamanE

Active member
Calcium Reactors. Are they better than 2 part? If so, why?

I know for smaller tanks 2 part is a no brainer, but for bigger tanks with lots of SPS? Are they as finicky as some claim (and ive always believed)?

Ive never used one, so asking for advise.
 
Never had a reactor but in theory a CaRx driven by a medical grade peristaltic pump would be the best for a large system. Maybe both for redundancy?
 
Always figured that the reactor is very set it and forget it once you have it dialed in. Definitely easier with keeping big demanding tanks.
 
I have a Maxima Clam and other Mg/Ca demanding SPS corals, and find that two part is enough.

However I don't test for anything, including Mg, Alk, Ca, PH, etc. I am planning on buying my first test kit this weekend at Exotic Aquariums since they have a sale, so that will be fun!

I wonder what my parameters will be with 2+ years of just bi-weekly water changes and two part! Cool, no?
 
Never had a reactor but in theory a CaRx driven by a medical grade peristaltic pump would be the best for a large system. Maybe both for redundancy?


The biggest negative I've seen with the CaRx is the effluent line or valve getting clogged. Running it with the peristaltic pump overcomes this issue.

I will say that my ph has never been as high dosing two part versus running reactor. I also like the idea of dissolving coral skeleton (reborn media) into the water.

Eddie if you are going to go CaRx, also look into the aquarium plants Carbondoser.
 
I have a Ca reactor in line but not using it currently since I started using the Kalk reactor. I am able to keep and maintain both Ca and alkalinity via kalkwasser reactor.
I do have the Ca reactor in line just in case I need it.
 
You nailed it. For a smaller tank, dosing is the way to go. Larger tanks with high ALK CA requirements are easier with a reactor. I use a Geo with a AP Regulator and Masterflex Peri Pump. Rock solid.
 
The biggest negative I've seen with the CaRx is the effluent line or valve getting clogged. Running it with the peristaltic pump overcomes this issue.

I will say that my ph has never been as high dosing two part versus running reactor. I also like the idea of dissolving coral skeleton (reborn media) into the water.

Eddie if you are going to go CaRx, also look into the aquarium plants Carbondoser.

Marvin- How does running a peristalsic pump overcome a a valve or effluent line getting clogged?

and yes, ive seen the AP carbondoser, it looks awesome, but MAN...$$$$$$
 
I have a Ca reactor in line but not using it currently since I started using the Kalk reactor. I am able to keep and maintain both Ca and alkalinity via kalkwasser reactor.
I do have the Ca reactor in line just in case I need it.

DoogyDoc- sure Kalk is fine since it doses both ALK/Ca equally, but at some point demmand on SPS tanks exceed its capability with just ATO additions.
 
The valve is what regulates flow. You open and close it to modulate. With a peristaltic pump you regulate the flow via the pump, nothing to clog or gum up. The cole/palmer pumps are EXPENSIVE!!!!!!!!! You see them used from time to time on the for sale forum or ebay.
 
Nope, you want something constant and with the ability to fine tune. But what do I know. I'm just book smart:wildone:
 
HTML:
Nope, you want something constant and with the ability to fine tune. But what do I know. I'm just book smart:wildone:

That would be constant, and gate valves (unlike Ballvalves) allow fine tuning. Just a though, I dont know either.
 
from what I understand about it, the supply pressure from the return pump wont be constant, pressure in the reactor will fluctuate over time and you will be adjusting the needle valve/bubble count
 
Aquamane, I use 2 part for my sps dominated 210 plus 29 gallon frag tank, I dose 100ml of each per day. I do 30 gallon water changes weekly. I have done it for over 3 years. I used a bubble magus doser and now use a jeboa dp4 that I check monthly for calibration. I only fill 2liter container to avoid issues if it get stuck on the on position. I also top off with Kalk. 4 gallon esv last me 5 months at $90 per refill. So about $200 per year. It's very true about keeping an eye on SG. It builds up fast.

I am planning an upgrade to 400+ and will have to switch to a reactor in near future.
 
from what I understand about it, the supply pressure from the return pump wont be constant, pressure in the reactor will fluctuate over time and you will be adjusting the needle valve/bubble count

How is that different than with a peristalsic pump? if pressure in the reactor changes even a peristalsic pump will need adjusting.
 
Aquamane, I use 2 part for my sps dominated 210 plus 29 gallon frag tank, I dose 100ml of each per day. I do 30 gallon water changes weekly. I have done it for over 3 years. I used a bubble magus doser and now use a jeboa dp4 that I check monthly for calibration. I only fill 2liter container to avoid issues if it get stuck on the on position. I also top off with Kalk. 4 gallon esv last me 5 months at $90 per refill. So about $200 per year. It's very true about keeping an eye on SG. It builds up fast.

I am planning an upgrade to 400+ and will have to switch to a reactor in near future.

Thanks BigZman- I already dose 2 part and Kalk. Im trying to improve (hopefully) with a CaRx, if it is indeed a improvement.
 
Dadummy is correct. As the pump gums up over time or whatever else your feeding with it changes the pressure may change. The consensus is you want as good a regulator as you can get your hands on or a peristaltic. The whole purpose of the Rx is to set it and forget it and eliminating all variables is key in being able to achieve that.
 
Calcium Reactors vs 2 part??

Rogger can probably give you much better info around the valves. He's probably the person I know that's run a calcium reactor the longest. But in my short time using the reactor, I always have to open the valve to clear the effluent after some time. I'll set the effluent to a slight stream and notice it slow down to a drip over time.

With the peristaltic pump (you can even use a stenner) you avoid using a valve on the end and the pump is used to "dose" the effluent like Rovster mentioned. I'll try to find the thread where people are using this method. It basically works similar to how you'd use a mall reactor. You are pumping water into the reactor. The volume and rate you pump in gets pumped out.
 
Back
Top