Assuming you follow best practices coral protocol (dipping and quarantine), why would adding coral require a "reset" of the fallow period, when going fallow (no fish) for ich and velvet?
In other words, in theory, yes, coral and rock and other non-fish items can potentially carry the parasites. That is why you treat them. But assuming you take the precautions you would otherwise take in adding coral to an up-and-running tank, why would a "cleaned" piece of coral cause a reset of the fallow period? The point of the fallow period is to deny fish hosts, not to deny new items of cleaned non-fish hosts.
I've looked through 10 years of posts on RC, and find conflicting opinions. Is there some weird part of the logic here that I am missing?
Please, if you offer an opinion, I would love an explanation of the logic of how the parasite in the tank gets a new turn of its life cycle by adding a piece of parasite-free coral. It seems like the forums would benefit from a definitive verdict on this question.
Thanks!
In other words, in theory, yes, coral and rock and other non-fish items can potentially carry the parasites. That is why you treat them. But assuming you take the precautions you would otherwise take in adding coral to an up-and-running tank, why would a "cleaned" piece of coral cause a reset of the fallow period? The point of the fallow period is to deny fish hosts, not to deny new items of cleaned non-fish hosts.
I've looked through 10 years of posts on RC, and find conflicting opinions. Is there some weird part of the logic here that I am missing?
Please, if you offer an opinion, I would love an explanation of the logic of how the parasite in the tank gets a new turn of its life cycle by adding a piece of parasite-free coral. It seems like the forums would benefit from a definitive verdict on this question.
Thanks!