Canon XTi vs. Nikon D40x vs. Nikon D80

[Jon770]

Hi - was looking for some help in deciding on a new D-SLR. I posted the same thing on my local group's forum, but was thinking I might get more responses on an all-photography forum.

I have my first baby on the way and decided that I wanted something better than my current point and shoot. I primarily want to take pics of the family, but will also use it for tank shots, etc... I’ve come to the realization that the best ‘entry-level’ D-SLR for the money is either the Canon XTi or the Nikon D40x. Then there is always the ‘mid-level’ Nikon D80, which alot of people seem to love. As a true novice with SLR photography, I feel comfortable getting an entry level camera, but at the same time I don’t want to kick myself a couple years down the road for not spending the extra couple bucks to get the D80. While money is definitely a factor in my decision and I would prefer to save the $400, if it will make <u>THAT</u> big a difference, then I will pay the extra $$$ for the D80.

So….here are my options of cameras/kits to get. Which one do you think I should go with, and why?


<b>OPTION 1: $749 â€"œ Nikon D40x with Two-Lens Bonus Outfit (18-55 & 55-200)</b>
<i>Main accessories besides camera body:</i>
Nikon AF-S DX ZOOM-NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED
AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED
Nikon bag and Nikon instructional DVDs

<b>OPTION 2: $749 â€"œ Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi 2 lens Zoom Kit (18-55 & 75-300)</b>
<i>Main accessories besides camera body:</i>
EF-S 18-55mm II
EF-S 75-300mm III

<b>OPTION 3: $1,043 â€"œ Nikon D80 Digital SLR Camera Kit with 18-135mm Lens</b>
<i>Main accessories besides camera body:</i>
18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom Nikkor lens

<b>OPTION 4: $1,099 â€"œ Nikon D80 Digital SLR Two-Lens Bonus Outfit (18-55 & 55-200)</b>
<i>Main accessories besides camera body:</i>
18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX Lens
AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED
Nikon bag and Nikon instructional DVDs

<b>OPTION 5: $1,149 â€"œ Nikon D80 Digital SLR Two-Lens Bonus Outfit (18-55 & VR 55-200)</b>
<i>Main accessories besides camera body:</i>
18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX Lens
Nikon 55-200 mm F/4 5.6G ED-IF AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor Lens w/ Vibration Reduction
Nikon bag and Nikon instructional DVDs<br><p>

 

[Nick A]

If you want to be able to autofocus with non AF-S lenses, then go with the D80. Non AF-S lenses can be used on the D40(x), its just that you have to manually focus the lens. People make such a huge issue over the D40(x) lacking non AF-S lens capability but they don't really know that the most widely used lenses are the 12-24 f4, 17-55 f2.8, and the 70-200mm f2.8, all being AF-S lenses. The only problem about these three lenses is that they cost a pretty penny. A very nice all-around lens would be the 18-200 VR, but that can run you around $700.

The D40(x)'s main advantage is just it's size. My brother who shoots a D200 is looking at getting a D40 just for days when he doesn't want people gawking at his huge D200. In addition the D40(x) is very light, if weight is an issue to you. I got my friend into photography and he started off with a D40, but is starting the feel the need to upgrade to a D70s or D80.

The D80 allows CLS control for speedlights such as the SB-600 and SB-800, meaning you can set up the flash in such a way that it will flash wirelessly. Also you don't really need to constantly use the rear screen in order to change a setting unlike the D40(x). I have played around with my friend's D40, but prefer being able to change settings through the viewfinder or by the top screen.

As for the options listed, it would have to be option 5 as having VR is a really nice feature. I have heard of distortion issues with the 18-135, although I have seen pretty good pictures taken with it.

 

[Phyl]

Of the kits you have listed, I'd go with option number 5. Add in an SB-600 for good measure.

Though really a better combination would be the Nikon D80 (781) with a Nikon 17-55 ($1200), unfortunately at a higher price tag. But if you want to get great pictures of your new baby that's the lens to do it with.

 

[Jon770]

so no one likes the Canon XTi?

 

[BlueCorn]

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11414642#post11414642 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Jon770
so no one likes the Canon XTi?

Canon holds about 65% of the DSLR market so I wouldn't say "no one"

 

[xxxbadfishxxx]

I got a D50 and love it, my buddy has a D80 and i like it more. I also have a friend that has the D40x, i personally dont like it, rather have the D50.

I would highly suggest getting the Nikkor 18-70mm DX Lens, thats what i got and love it.

 

[Phyl]

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11414788#post11414788 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by beerguy
Canon holds about 65% of the DSLR market so I wouldn't say "no one"

Pfft!



I think what you'll find is that Canonites will sing Canon praises and Nikonians will sing Nikon praises. Rarely will the two meet anywhere in what constitutes the middle.

At the end of the day you'll need to figure out which one feels better in your hand. The camera you enjoy holding will be the one that you use more often than not.

 

[ssbreef]

OPTION 2: $749 â€"œ Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi 2 lens Zoom Kit (18-55 & 75-300)
Main accessories besides camera body:
EF-S 18-55mm II
EF-S 75-300mm III

 

[Jon770]

Thanks for all the replies....I really appreciate the input.

I'm quickly finding that Phyllis is exactly right - whatever brand people have is typically the brand they say is the best. I have not heard many people say: "I had <b>X</b> model Canon and hated it and swiched to <b>X</b> model Nikon" or vice versa. If anything, they switched different models but in the same brand.

 

[Phyl]

Once you buy your first lens you lock into a camera system. From that single point on, changing systems becomes a compounded expense.

Each line is stuffed with pro glass at the high end line, so you're better off replacing that X lens (55-200) with the high end model in that range (70-200 VR) than switching brands.

Put the same picture next to each other of the same subject using the same focal length, from equally skilled photogs and equally matched glass (consumer v. consumer or pro v. pro) and you probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

Personally I don't like the way the canon line feels small and feeble in my hands. The feel of the D200 body is perfect (IMBO). I'm almost positive that the D80 has the same body style, if not the same materials.

 

[BlueCorn]

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11415696#post11415696 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Phyl

At the end of the day you'll need to figure out which one feels better in your hand. The camera you enjoy holding will be the one that you use more often than not.

That's exactly the advice that I normally give even though Canon is clearly makes a better camera

 

[BlueCorn]

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11416936#post11416936 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Phyl

Personally I don't like the way the canon line feels small and feeble in my hands.

I've never heard a 5D or 1D* referred to as "small and feeble."

:lol:

 

[Phyl]

Ya think he can pony up for one of those based on the list he suggested? LOL.

I suppose I could have said the way the canon prosumer line...

 

[Jon770]

I agree that the Canon Rebel series feels a bit small - but so does the Nikon 40 series....

Both company's mid-level cameras (Canon 30D/40D and Nikon D80) feel alot more substantial in your hands, but on the flip-side they are pretty heavy to lug around everywhere.


Man, this choice is even harder than when I decided to propose to my wife! <p>

 

[surfnvb7]

last year....and the previous subsequent years the Canon XT and XTi seemed to be the hot commodity. this year......it seems to be the entry level Nikons.

my guess is Nikon is winning the battle this holiday season due to the "feel" of the camera body, and the bad reputation canon got with the kit lens that comes with the XT and XTi. the entry level Nikon's probably have more bang for your buck straight out of the box.

IMO.......the entry level Nikon is probably better than the XT and XTi for the person who won't ever really get into the advanced stuff and upgrade equipment.

The Nikon's noise level at low to medium ISO's is really annoying IMO (don't even bother trying a high ISO on a Nikon)....which is why I chose Canon. That, along with Canon's superior L-glass and IS lenses if you want to pony up some $$$.

Canon also *seems* to have a larger variety in selection of 3rd party lenses and equipment.


I'm trading my XTi w/ battery grip, and telephoto L-lens to my father who wants a dSLR really bad now (he has an old film SLR). he's buying me a canon 40D, which blows the socks off of the XTi and all of the Nikon's (D80 etc.) they carry in the big box stores.
(obviously the pro type canon and nikon models are better than the 40D....but most stores don't carry them for obvious reasons)


btw......the small feeling of the XT and XTi, as well as the 40D (if you have big hands like me), can easily be fixed by the addition of a battery grip. the extra battery power alone makes it totally worth it.

 

[juniormc8704]

i had a d40, liked it, didnt love it. sold it, and bought the d80, and love it. i would buy the same again anytime, unless i had a bunch of extra cash then i would go for the canon 40D.

 

[ssbreef]

40D? really?...why not the nikon D200?

 

[RoseFishWatcher]

I just got a D40 as an early Xmas present. I'm new to photography in general (was using an old crappy point&shoot digital before), but I'm liking it a lot.

Here's a pic of my favorite hermit. I used manual settings (didn't know how to adjust aperture at the time since I'd only had the camera a few days, so it's pretty much just manual focus), so most pics are not in focus. He's right against the glass. The lens is the 18-55mm that comes with the camera.

(click for the full size pic)



Obviously, I haven't owned any of the other cameras on your list, so I can't really compare. Good luck with the decision!

 

[JeffReef]

If you're still open for suggestions I'd recommend Canon 40D and a Sigma 18-50 2.8 EX DG Macro. This combo would run you about $1700 but it's well worth the money.

Next paycheck, get the Sigma 50-150mm 2.8 EX DG and a Canon 580EX II flash. This will set you back another $1300.

Last, get the Sigma 150mm EX HSM for a true 1:1 macro lens, a Gitzo carbon tripod and a 1.4x or 2.0x teleconverter for your 50-150mm lens and you'd be good to go. This, btw, will set you back another $1300.

 

[jccash]

Perhaps you should buy a used Nikon D200

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/sitem/sku=800555571&is=USE