Just to point out, not only is he using an electronic ballast, but it looks as if he is overdriving 4 15 watt bulbs (60 watts) on a 2x54 watt rated ballast (108 watts)
The tank is beautiful, but I don't think I'd dare try something like that.
No way man, not with stock lighting....that is likely not enough light to sustain a clam past 6 months or so. Check the clam forum for experiences of people who have tried (Most all die)
Yes, you surely get more output from NO fluorescent tube when you drive them with bigger electric ballast. I use now one 2 x 54 w Osram ballast with 4 x 15w NO tubes.
In the start the tubes were driven with two Hagen 2 x 40w electric ballasts. I measured then that the LUX output increased about 30% in daylight tube. The ballast was not so good in quality and it did not last longer than couple of weeks. I haven't measured the power increase with current Osram ballast.
And of course you need good individual reflectors to get the best of your tube. Also in good metal halide light units you have individual reflector in every bulb
I had all the equipment at home for that 4 x 15w setup. If I would not had them, I would have used 4 x 24w T5 tubes to light the nano. ATI Powermodul 4 x 24w would have been an excellent choise. That gives 2w / 1l, and it surely is enough.
thrldride: sorry, my mistake, I was trying to say it is important to have individual reflectors with every fluorescent tube like you have with metal halide bulbs. Or jokaisen loisteputken kanssa on tärkeää käyttää yksilöllistä heijastinta kuten metallihalogeeni polttimoilla
I think its really cool that you are overdriving NO bulbs Haaga, do you have any idea on how long those 18 watt bulbs will last being powered at 27 watts?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.