M Mark75 New member Jul 3, 2007 #1 Should I use Chemi-pure or activated carbon in the filter compartment of my HOB. Maybe both??
marduc New member Jul 3, 2007 #3 <a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10266026#post10266026 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kau_cinta_ku activated carbon gets my vote Click to expand... mine too
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10266026#post10266026 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kau_cinta_ku activated carbon gets my vote Click to expand... mine too
P plummike New member Jul 3, 2007 #5 carbon. chemi does less for a lot more money. I buy 5 gal buckets on Ebay.
A Amphiprion Premium Member Jul 3, 2007 #6 I use high capacity carbon in bulk. Still cheaper than chemipure.
marduc New member Jul 4, 2007 #8 I run carbon and phosban separately, carbon is more resilient to agitation than phosphate adsorption media.
I run carbon and phosban separately, carbon is more resilient to agitation than phosphate adsorption media.
E eddified New member Jul 4, 2007 #9 other then the price do the 1 do something the other doesn't? or do they both pretty much serve the same function thanks ed
other then the price do the 1 do something the other doesn't? or do they both pretty much serve the same function thanks ed
Psychojam New member Jul 4, 2007 #10 Would't make more sense to keep PhosBan and carbon separate since you need to replace the carbon much more frequently?
Would't make more sense to keep PhosBan and carbon separate since you need to replace the carbon much more frequently?
BWine New member Jul 4, 2007 #11 I run both Phosban and carbon in the same reactor. I just replace the carbon when needed.