rsman
New member
lol. rsman, you busted me with one of my own pet peeves. touche. I subscribed to this thread years ago. Was bumping because phil hadn't gotten any replies in two weeks. I hesitate to respond to posts when I don't have personal experience (and I don't in this area). Was hoping someone who had actually ran them would chime in. I can relate to being busy...on the road in FL for two months.....But I will take your advice and ask a couple questions for you or anyone else with experience.
i can apreciate that so here is the response to phil's post
OK, I think I'm going to jump on the bandwagon and build one of these. I've got a 150g reef and a 30g sump with a small fuge w/macro in it. Although my nitrates are down now, they have sometimes loitered at 10 ppm or slightly above.
sounds good coil denitrators can go nice into a fuge if you can do it carefully, the increased CO2 is great for growing macro's, the low ammonia/nitrite/nitrate however can be bad, so mix incoming water in a way that nothing is splashed and you get a good flow of both.
I'm concerned about the potential for clogs in the .17" ID tubing so I'd like to go with some 1/4" ID drip irrigation tubing instead. If I've worked out the ratios correctly I should use roughly 86' of the 1/4" ID tubing instead of 50' of the .17" ID tubing, and I could expect about twice the drip rate from this.
as long as you dont use ANY connectors to extend the length and keep it DARK the potential for clogs is identical, the 86' is kinda wrong ish, the problem is that the length goes up faster than the diameter goes out, 100 ~ 120 is better 80 wont kill nothing, but itll have a reduced max output a tank that loiters at 10ppm this isnt a problem. a larger tank or higher bioload would need more coils at 80' or extended coils
Finally, I'm thinking about using a short 5" or 6" diameter PVC pipe instead of a taller 3" or 4" one, and I've got a bag of Siporax that I plan to put inside.
whatever its REALLY UN IMPORTANT as to how big it is or whats in it, it just needs some surface area that water is not moving fast across
Does all this sound OK, or should I just use the classic icemaker approach and not worry about clogs? If I go with the dripline, should I have a single coil or go for a double. Same question if I stay with the 0.17" approach--should I go with 1, 2 or even 3 of the 50' coils?
try 1 now, build a bigger better one IF you feel you need to
Many thanks for any and all comments,
sorry for the delay
Phil
Early on when this thread started you said you were of the opinion that 50' was the minimum length and 75' was better. More recently you've said 50' is recommended. I'm assuming we're talking about the same .17ID tubing discussed earlier. Has experience taught you that the longer length isn't really required?
Or are you doing a tradeoff (i.e. shorter length for slower flow)?
this is actually a reflection of many things, when i changed my recomendation i started doing a document that i NEED to complete SOON, in which i actually ran the numbers myself and just decided its better to recomend 50' the next reason it seems to be that no one is getting it, the other side is that it depends on how its hooked up, gravity feed gets shorter coils than pumped the trade off is as noted shorter length == slower flow. this is from both looking for hours and hours thru complex documents and experimenting to see what happens. i run 7 of these
How'd your plan to string four DCs together feeding into a fifth chamber work out? Did you get the buffering affect you anticipated out of the fifth chamber? im not sure to what your refering to here ???
I've got more, but I'll stop there. Don't have a specific tank I'm going to put one on....but since they're cheap and easy to make, I might make a few while I'm away from home for grins. please post though, im making notes as i go for things i shud clear up in that document.
i can apreciate that so here is the response to phil's post
OK, I think I'm going to jump on the bandwagon and build one of these. I've got a 150g reef and a 30g sump with a small fuge w/macro in it. Although my nitrates are down now, they have sometimes loitered at 10 ppm or slightly above.
sounds good coil denitrators can go nice into a fuge if you can do it carefully, the increased CO2 is great for growing macro's, the low ammonia/nitrite/nitrate however can be bad, so mix incoming water in a way that nothing is splashed and you get a good flow of both.
I'm concerned about the potential for clogs in the .17" ID tubing so I'd like to go with some 1/4" ID drip irrigation tubing instead. If I've worked out the ratios correctly I should use roughly 86' of the 1/4" ID tubing instead of 50' of the .17" ID tubing, and I could expect about twice the drip rate from this.
as long as you dont use ANY connectors to extend the length and keep it DARK the potential for clogs is identical, the 86' is kinda wrong ish, the problem is that the length goes up faster than the diameter goes out, 100 ~ 120 is better 80 wont kill nothing, but itll have a reduced max output a tank that loiters at 10ppm this isnt a problem. a larger tank or higher bioload would need more coils at 80' or extended coils
Finally, I'm thinking about using a short 5" or 6" diameter PVC pipe instead of a taller 3" or 4" one, and I've got a bag of Siporax that I plan to put inside.
whatever its REALLY UN IMPORTANT as to how big it is or whats in it, it just needs some surface area that water is not moving fast across
Does all this sound OK, or should I just use the classic icemaker approach and not worry about clogs? If I go with the dripline, should I have a single coil or go for a double. Same question if I stay with the 0.17" approach--should I go with 1, 2 or even 3 of the 50' coils?
try 1 now, build a bigger better one IF you feel you need to
Many thanks for any and all comments,
sorry for the delay
Phil
Early on when this thread started you said you were of the opinion that 50' was the minimum length and 75' was better. More recently you've said 50' is recommended. I'm assuming we're talking about the same .17ID tubing discussed earlier. Has experience taught you that the longer length isn't really required?
Or are you doing a tradeoff (i.e. shorter length for slower flow)?
this is actually a reflection of many things, when i changed my recomendation i started doing a document that i NEED to complete SOON, in which i actually ran the numbers myself and just decided its better to recomend 50' the next reason it seems to be that no one is getting it, the other side is that it depends on how its hooked up, gravity feed gets shorter coils than pumped the trade off is as noted shorter length == slower flow. this is from both looking for hours and hours thru complex documents and experimenting to see what happens. i run 7 of these
How'd your plan to string four DCs together feeding into a fifth chamber work out? Did you get the buffering affect you anticipated out of the fifth chamber? im not sure to what your refering to here ???
I've got more, but I'll stop there. Don't have a specific tank I'm going to put one on....but since they're cheap and easy to make, I might make a few while I'm away from home for grins. please post though, im making notes as i go for things i shud clear up in that document.