Sorry for not being clearer - yes as in Frag.
Gotcha- there was an article discussing the survival rate of frags versus "larger frags" . ( sept/oct issue of Reef &marine aquarium Magazine, Article "How large should a coral fragment be?" pg 81) From what this article/ research states, larger Acropora frags survive and grow faster than smaller frags. That being stated, they also conducted multiple tests -of them, one was- frags glued underwater, as well as out of water. The survival rate of frags (2.5cm , or roughly 1inch) glued out of water had approx. 20% survival rate, where as frags slightly larger (3.5cm, or roughly 1.5 inch) had a survival rate of 80% or more. They also conducted the same test with same sizes, but glued them underwater, and both came out to near 90% survival rate.
They next investigated whether the increase in length was greater in the larger frags than in the smaller cuttings. The average annual increase in length was 3 inches for the large, and 2 inches per year in the smaller specimens.
In relation to your question, what I have gathered in this article was
1, most importantly, large or larger frags show a HIGHER survival rate than smaller frags.
2. possibility of more growth from larger frags annually
3. if you do conduct , or a fellow local reefer frags for you, and the size falls under the 1.5 inch , be sure to have them glue underwater for better survival rate.... lol
4. on a separate note, in my opinion, there IS a difference in survival rate when it comes to the difference in " maricultured" or "aquacultured". Again, this has been MY experience....
5. sorry for the rambling.
:lolspin: Happy reefing!!