elegance coral
They call me EC
I dont siphon my sand I let my nassarius snails do that.
You trained your snails to syphon your sand???? Now that's amazing!!!!! I can't get the critters in my tank to do anything but eat and poo.
I dont siphon my sand I let my nassarius snails do that.
i alway read about crush coral being a nitrate factory.
If that is the case, wouldn't using the coarser grained reefflakes have the same problem? Is the grain size of reefflake the same as crushed corals?
I alway read about crush coral being a nitrate factory.
if that is the case, wouldn't using the coarser grained reefflakes have the same problem? is the grain size of reefflake the same as crushed corals?
I don't know anything about "reefflakes", but it's not the calcium carbonate based substrate that leads to elevated nitrate and phosphate. It's the accumulation of rotting organic matter in the substrate. If that organic matter is removed, it does not decompose and increase the nitrate and phosphate level in the water.
Exactly my point. So either the crushed coral being a nitrate factory is completely false, or the reefflakes is just overhyped and overpriced substrate where users do get nitrate problems but too embarrassed to admit it.
"I went bare bottom and I still see some nitrates"
Unless your tank has no waste producing inhabitants, there will always be "some" nitrates, nitrates & nitrogen gas are the end game of the water cycle. What is being discussed here is the potential for a serious build up of nitrate & phosphate producing gunk that ends up bringing on an epidemic of nuisance algae that can not be beaten back. While you are correct in all of your assertions about what caused those conditions in the first place, you are missing the fact that compacted sand does a far better job of keeping detritus on the surface where it can be consumed or blown into the water column & removed by a skimmer or filtration, where as crushed coral by its nature has far too many gaps, nooks & crannies that collect & make removal that much harder, even for the clean up crew it is much easier for them to sift through sand than it is crushed coral or any coarser type substrate. The arguement here is sand is BETTER than crushed coral, not that it will cure a nitrate problem. Those of us who have gone through this know, even when the main problem is identified, once the crushed substrate becomes foul, there is no other option but to remove it. You can gfo, refugiate,skimmate,vodka dosiate & algae scrubbiate until your blue or in this case green in the face, nothing works at this point.
I agree with everything you said, so no disagreement here, other than I did mention in my post (if you read it carefully) that "in due time", any substrate will have the same problem. which is exactly what you are saying that it will happen sooner with crushed coral. so we are saying essentially the same thing. I know it can happen to sand substrate, because that is what I had before.
the main point I am alluding to is, people will generally not tell you the whole story how the problem came about. then conveniently blame something else other than themselves for causing the problem. The part they conveniently omit is where they overstock or overfeed, and then then not do that anymore after changing the substrate, then concluding "oh, this must be a better substrate", but the actual solution is, in addition to replacing the substrate, is not overfeed and/or overstock. I also meant to point out the previous poster came to that conclusion only 2 weeks after switching substrate, which I think is too soon.
I agree with everything you said, so no disagreement here, other than I did mention in my post (if you read it carefully) that "in due time", any substrate will have the same problem. which is exactly what you are saying that it will happen sooner with crushed coral. so we are saying essentially the same thing. I know it can happen to sand substrate, because that is what I had before.
the main point I am alluding to is, people will generally not tell you the whole story how the problem came about. then conveniently blame something else other than themselves for causing the problem. The part they conveniently omit is where they overstock or overfeed, and then then not do that anymore after changing the substrate, then concluding "oh, this must be a better substrate", but the actual solution is, in addition to replacing the substrate, is not overfeed and/or overstock. I also meant to point out the previous poster came to that conclusion only 2 weeks after switching substrate, which I think is too soon.
sooo..the conclusions is,....
There is no conclusion....
well another 40 years we might understand the complexity of this hobby!
:ape::ape::ape:to replace the substrate and conclude after 2 weeks the old substrate is bad is a bit misleading, but does makes good tabloid style reading.