I'm still trying to understand all of this "zeo" procedure. I read through this entire thread as well as others. What I struggle with is understanding how someone would make the switch over if that is what they decide to do.
I have a 90 with two reactors - one for phosban and the other for carbon. If I wanted to try the zeostones, would I do away with both phosphate remover and carbon? In addition to the zeostones (which I have been unable to find on any site...aquarium specialty didn't have anything by the name of stones), supplementing with AA would be the proper course. It's tough because your results and others speak for themselves, but I would hate to have to combat an algae explosion by going to something different.
So, has anyone out there attempted to make the switch in my similar situation. Additionally, I only dose kalkwasser via topoff with my osmolator. It keeps things relatively stable, but I don't have a huge SPS population and truly would like to keep things mixed. Is this not a good option for someone desiring a mixed reef?
I have a 90 with two reactors - one for phosban and the other for carbon. If I wanted to try the zeostones, would I do away with both phosphate remover and carbon? In addition to the zeostones (which I have been unable to find on any site...aquarium specialty didn't have anything by the name of stones), supplementing with AA would be the proper course. It's tough because your results and others speak for themselves, but I would hate to have to combat an algae explosion by going to something different.
So, has anyone out there attempted to make the switch in my similar situation. Additionally, I only dose kalkwasser via topoff with my osmolator. It keeps things relatively stable, but I don't have a huge SPS population and truly would like to keep things mixed. Is this not a good option for someone desiring a mixed reef?