RichConley
New member
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7194004#post7194004 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by JerseyReef
The high flow levels that are reached in BB are for one purpose only. Suspend the detritus as along as possible and hope it gets to the skimmer via the overflow. High high flow is needed in any system, not to the levels seen in the BB setups.
While the merits of a larger, bigger, better skimmer has it's place in any system. Nobody is advocating the use of Seaclone over a beckett or similar type of skimmer. Some of the skimmers on the market now cost over $4K. Is that cost justified? I'm just not sure that a $4K skimmer is worth the money. My modified Remora Pro works great and only cost me ~$200
Didnt realize the barebottom guys had such rediculous clean up crews.
As to flow, I've got about 75x turnover in my sand bed tank, and I think its a huge help. Everything stays suspended. Yeah, the DSB is processing things, but not enough that its going to fill up.
As to skimmer cost, I said a big skimmer, not an expensive skimmer. The really expensive skimmer, 90% of what you are paying is so that its pretty. BK uses acrylic that costs 500+ per foot on some of its skimmers, when they could build the body for <$20 if they used a different plastic. But NOOOO...people want fancy acrylic skimmers.
That being said, I see too many people stating that the reason that BB are better than DSB is because DSB tanks have small skimmers and low flow, and that drives me nuts.
People need to realize that a reef tank is a reeftank, and BB and DSB are a lot more similar than they think. EXPORT EXPORT EXPORT!