Digital Refract- Milwaukee Digital VS Hanna Instruments ?

Digital Refract- Milwaukee Digital VS Hanna Instruments ?

Which would you recommend for accuracy, quality and ease of use ?

Hanna-

Hanna Instruments Digital Seawater Refractometer

Milwaukee-

Milwaukee Seawater Digital Refractometer with Protective Hardshell Case
 
I also have the Milwaukee and absolutely love it. I have calibration fluid and check it once a month and it is never off at all. Best thing I've ever bought for my tanks.
 
Digital Refract- Milwaukee Digital VS Hanna Instruments ?

The Hanna is a re-branded Milwaukee. You didn't notice that they're virtually identical except for color/branding ?

Unless you're going hiking with it I don't see the value of the hard case. Save yourself that cost. Mine sits where I can use it and never moves.
 
Wow, very positive review from you guys !

I have the meter from BRS, but my eyesight is not good and I have to point it at a lamp or direct sunlight to view the reading, so that's why I was looking at these two digital units.

And I agree with reefvet, I don't need the case.

Although I've never heard of this company, they have the lowest price.

Test Equipment Depot. $96 and free shipping.

What do you think ?

http://www.testequipmentdepot.com/milwaukee/refractometers/ma887.htm
 
Wow, very positive review from you guys !

I have the meter from BRS, but my eyesight is not good and I have to point it at a lamp or direct sunlight to view the reading, so that's why I was looking at these two digital units.

And I agree with reefvet, I don't need the case.

Although I've never heard of this company, they have the lowest price.

Test Equipment Depot. $96 and free shipping.

What do you think ?

http://www.testequipmentdepot.com/milwaukee/refractometers/ma887.htm

Never owned the Hannah but do own the Milwaukee and can say it is a solid and easy to use unit. Since a good refractometer is $40ish spending an extra $60 is a good investment.
 
I just watched a video on BRS about Refractometer's. He really like's the digital. He mentioned using a calibration fluid, since we're not using it at "0" range with RO/DI.

Other video's I've watched on YouTube are using RO/DO to calibrate.

So why are both RO and special calibrating fluid being used ?
Is the RO method giving us incorrect results ?
If so, by how much ?

I'll have 4 tanks set up, do we need to recalibrate the machine after checking each tank ?
 
they are advertising an accuracy of +or- 2ppt ???

that seems like a pretty wide range , that means if you're shooting for 36ppt it could really be at 38 ppt ???

this doesn't seem to be as accurate as a regular refractometer
 
Hum,..... :confused:

Speciation's-

Range 0 to 50 PSU
0 to 150 ppt
1 .000 to 1.114 S.G. (20/20)
0 to 80°C / 32 to 176°F
Resolution 1 PSU
1 ppt
0.001 S.G. (20/20)
0.1°C / 0.1°F
Accuracy ±2 PSU
±2 ppt
±0.002 S.G. (20/20)
±0.3°C / ±0.5°F

The SG seems closer at .002.
 
I didn't appreciate the Milwaukee unit until I started having to test multiple batches of salt water at once. I run my QT a bit lower than my DT. ... So I make and premix 2 separate batches of water. Hence at any given time I am running up to like 4 tests.
 
The Milwaukee is so fast at making multiple readings that I always zero the unit with RODI then test with 35 put cal fluid and it's always spot on.
 
Back
Top