Ditching the MJ-mods for a closed loop?

coralreefing

Premium Member
I started my tank with 5 MJ-1200s on a wave maker. The corals were happy but that's a lot of hardware in the tank & 5 pumps to maintain. I replaced them with 2 MJ-mods mounted on magnets last year. Now I have more flow & less hardware. Happy? Well I could be if there weren't kids in the house. Seems like every time my daughter has friends over, one of them grabs one of the magnetic mounts & says what does this do? Then I have a 4000gph. sand storm.

I'm trying to figure out how to plumb a closed loop on a tank that isn't drilled. Any Ideas?
 
You could do an over the tank return with no problem. Just make sure that you get a pump that can handle slightly negative NPSH (Net Pressure Suction Head). Alot of pumps can handle this as long as you prime them before startup.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11661266#post11661266 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by coralreefing
Happy? Well I could be if there weren't kids in the house. Seems like every time my daughter has friends over, one of them grabs one of the magnetic mounts & says what does this do? Then I have a 4000gph. sand storm.

Glue a plastic spider to the magnetic mount?
 
Thanks guys. I knew I had seen pics of an over the wall loop before but I didn't remember where. I'm thinking of adding an internal overfolw box to hide the intake plumbing & loc line returns, maybe with penductors....
 
I have mine set up pretty much like Melev's. I have an oceans motions on mine instead of the scwd though. It works very well, just doesn't look as good as the drilled tanks.
 
My only advice if you do an over the tank is to watch where you put your plumbing. I've seen people run them in a big circle around the tank with locline coming off. This gives you a lot of flexibility in providing flow, but the piping can block a surprising amount of light, especially around the edges and in the corners where there is already lower light areas.
 
i have a cl on my tank and love it. tank is not drilled. use a pcx 40 punp and never turn it off. i done have penductors, but could. my system is all 1". will post pics later.
 
You have all given me a lot to think about.

I am currently considering 2 closed loops (1000-1500 gal. each) to get enough flow. I think 2 small pumps will be better than 1 larger pump. I could also add an inline filter, like a lifegard cannister, to one loop for mechanical filtration.

I'm undecided about wave makers at this point. The SCWD is priced right but I've seen a lot of bad reviews about them breaking & I think their size might restrict flow too much. The oceans motions looks like a quality unit but it's expensive & very bulky. I don't know if I would have room for it.

Please reply if you think I'm heading down the wrong path.
 
I think your reasoning is right on. The closed loop with penductors is hard to beat for the price/maintenance/child proofing and I have used one for years. With that said I am converting to three Tunze steams, 2 on controllers. These are much more expensive and probably not an option but IMO provide random flow with much less wattage than a typical closed loop. I would consider the Squid or an OM 2 way on at least one CL if you are doing 2. The squids have a bad rap from some but others such as I and cee (Dave) have used them with success (I have one on my 29 and it has worked well for over a year now). If you feel brave you can drill them out a bit to relieve some of the back pressure caused by the restriction. The OM 2 ways aren't too expensive....around $130 if I remember correctly. Either way you may have to still add a powerhead or two but overall I think you will be happier than with the 1200's alone.
Chris
 
Chris
If I use 2 Quiet one 6000 pumps (1506 gph each) you think I will still need a couple power heads. I'm only using 2 MJ mods now & trying to reduce hardware in the tank.
 
First, I wouldnt use the quiet one pumps. They have horrible restart problems, which I am sure that you don't want to deal with. Secondly, I would only use one pump, because two smaller pumps are generally more innefficient than one large pump. I would also check into the sea swirl. I use the 1" model on my tank and love it.
 
If you already have the Quiet one's I would'nt use them with penductors as they don't handle pressure well. If you don't have them I would think about an external pump/s instead.
That would be about 20x's turnover in your tank which might be ok for what you want to do. I have about 80x's in my tank but of course I'm mainy keeping SPS. In general I think it's good to shoot for at least 20 - 30x's in most tanks with that being variable depending on what you are keeping, randomness etc....
FWIW I have planned 2 tanks now with the initial idea being just getting down to a CL and the return for flow and I've always wanted/needed more flow.
Chris
 
Thanks for the advice guys. I haven used a quiet one before so I didn't know about their restart problems. I was just reading up on the penductors this morning & learned about their need for a HP pump. I haven bought anything yet & I don't plan to until I have a solid plan.

2 pumps...
I was planning 2 pumps because I wanted to run one loop through an inline mechanical filter & no filter would handle 3000+ gph. Maybe I should just get a big cannister filter for filtration & a big external pump for a loop.

Sea swirl...
I like the idea of the sea swirls but they mount in the back & direct flow toward the front glass. If there's a way I could mount them at the front where the flow could be directed toward the reef that would be awesome.
 
Alternatively, you could split the output of the pump and put in gate/ball valves after the split to control the flow of water through the filter (this is what I did for my return pumps to feed fluidized bed reactors).

On the quiet one, I had one that I was using for a return pump that had very serious restart problems (I'm talking maybe 20% of the time it would restart properly). I'm not aware if they've done anything to remedy that situation, but not restarting is totally unacceptable, especially for a return pump.
 
c_stowers's plumbing

c_stowers's plumbing

Chris's tank, I just took the photos. I'll even let him do the Q&A.

IMG_0844.jpg

IMG_0837.jpg

IMG_0838.jpg

IMG_0839.jpg

IMG_0840.jpg

IMG_0835.jpg
 
You could possibly mount a sea swirl to the front of a tank, but it really isn't neaded. If you set it up similar to mine, the flow of the sea swirl collides with the flow of the penductors to create a random flow pattern around the front of the reef. It's all a matter of trial and error. But in reality, the huge advantage of a CL over a couple of Tunzees is the fact that the flow is more versitile. You can do your plumbing so that you have many directable outlets to create more possible flow patterns.
 
DMB
I think if i tried to split the output, the restriction from the filter media would cause the water to just bypass the filter all together. It would probably work better on a fluidized filter because there is less restriction. Do you agree?
 
Back
Top