Do you test Redox

Do you test Redox

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 16.0%
  • No

    Votes: 21 84.0%

  • Total voters
    25
I never have but I did find this useful info when I researched it a while back. It is on page 2 of http://www.seachem.com/support/Articles/ContrarianReef.html

Here it is in case the link doesn't work.
Redox is another poorly understood measurement in the hobby. Redox is measured with an electrode, very much like pH is measured with an electrode. Just as electrode pH measurements are very much dependent on a properly functioning and calibrated electrode, true redox measurements are even more dependent on function and calibration of the electrode. Unfortunately, redox calibrators do not have the stability characteristic of pH calibrators. While accuracy and precision are dependent on electrode function, many hobbyists have the natural inclination to assume that digital read-outs are highly accurate, regardless of the condition of the electrode.The assumption behind redox measurements is that organics depress redox and the removal of organics raises redox. All organics are assumed to be harmful. High redox is associated with oxygenation and good water quality. In fact, redox is a measure of the ratio or equilibrium between oxidizing and reducing substances in the water. It does not address the issue of whether these oxidants or reductants are harmful or beneficial. The underlying assumption is that oxidants are good, reductants are bad. Redox measurements can be useful if they are made reliably and the aquarists is aware of what can alter measurements without necessarily reflecting a decline or improvement in water quality. The addition of strong oxidizing agents, such as ozone, peroxide, permanganate, persulfate, or hypochlorite, will produce an immediate rise in redox of themselves, and this has no particular benefit. Ultimately, these oxidants will oxidize something oxidizable and that may be of benefit, but the benefit was not reflected by the initial rise of redox from the oxidants themselves.
Likewise, the addition of reductants, such as vitamin C, other vitamins, amino acids, some nutrients, dechlorinating or ammonia removing compounds, will cause a drop of redox, but this does not reflect a decline in water quality. Even innocent fluctuations, such as pH, alkalinity, or temperature rise, will cause a drop in redox. Day or night, feeding, filtering media, water changes, all of these have innocent effects that are not faithfully reflected by redox changes. High nitrates are undesirable, yet nitrates will cause an upward swing in redox. Redox measurements are a tool. Used intelligently they can be helpful, used compulsively they can be dangerous. Provided an aquarium is well oxygenated and well maintained with water changes and some form of chemical treatment such as skimming and organic filtration, it is more likely that damage will be caused by too high a redox than by too low a redox, usually because someone feels compelled to raise redox by adding some strong oxidizing agent. Using a redox meter is a lot like investing in stocks. If you follow the normal ups and downs too closely, you will probably end up losing it all. It is very possible to maintain a successful reef aquarium without ever taking a single redox measurement.
 
Yes I know all about redox testing and how much it should be the benchmark of water quality but I am just wondering how many people actually do it.

Thanks
Scott
 
Interesting. Never heard of this concept as it pertains to reefs until today but it makes lots of sense from a chemistry standpoint. Let me guess, like pH probes, RedOx probes are somewhat expensive and have a half-life to their effectiveness?
 
But ofcourse. I have been reading into this quite a bit lately and it seems that most people who dont run ozone dont test for redox. Seeing how apparently its important I was just trying to gauge the amount of people who do test. Also trying to figure out what, if any are the realworld advantages of testing redox.

Scott
 
I did a bit of reading on it and it certianly doen't seem nessary expecially considering the cost of doing. There seems to be too many limiting facotrs involved with it, such as false positives and false negatives.
Rob
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8438336#post8438336 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Be1withthereef
Maybe worth asking Randy Holmes-Farley in the chem forum for an unbias opinion
quote from Randy's article on ORP:
"I have not measured ORP in my aquarium for years, despite having the tools at hand. It is simply not very high on the list of things that one can usefully do to maintain a high quality reef aquarium, in my opinion."

In regards to this poll I think I know the one URS member that tests for ORP.
Hint: it's especially useful to monitor ORP when running ozone. ;)
 
Back
Top