Sarah, Kae and others
I was asked to come here for a look.
First, a nice set of posts

. Second as far as CO2 addition in seawater aquariums goes it is not an issue of adding CO2 for marine plants. Most marine plants are algaes and don't follow the rule of CO2 uptake that FW plants do. Most macro's do not consume CO2 but HCO3-. However, lower forms of marine algae, usually those not wanted, do consume CO2. The issue behind the CO2 addition is NOT to add CO2 for a C source but to add CO2 to control the pH. And it is actually the main reason for the same in FW. As CO2 leaves the system it causes a shift in the ratio of CO2:HCO3-:CO3. As the CO2 and HCO3- become depleted the pH rises as the reaction shifts to the left. With out the addition of a CO2 source the pH can rise up into 9's. This is at its worse in heavily planted tanks, especially FW and at time in marine planted tanks.
FW has lots of CO2, unlike Seawater which has almost none. NSW only has about 0.40 ppm CO2. If one keeps a higher Alk there will be more CO2 and as the pH drops for 8.3 to say 8.0 the CO2 rises even more.
As are as a reduction in the Alk in planted tanks it is more on the order of the organics the plants give off that reduce that Alk.
Mine states that it is measuring carbonate, bicarbonate, borate and hydroxide. Total Alk in the pure sense may include all the rest, but maybe that isn't what I'm actually measuring.
Yes, that is what TA is. Some kits are then set up to measure components of TA. These are often called P and M Alk , BA and Hydroxide Alk. Hydroxide Alk does not come into play unit the pH is in the 9's. Most tanks that are not being sup'd with Borate will have none, so in a sense the kit's T-Alk is nothing more than a CA kit.
Alk is best looked at as is often used in Limnology books. Alk = ANC (Acid Neutalizing Capactiy). And the more acids a tank puts out the more the ANC/Alk will be depleted.
3D-Reef
I wonder if dripping seltzer water(carbonic acid) would be even easier than Co2?
Yes, it will work and would depend on the demand of the CO2 uptake. Some do use this method. Lets look at the actual CO2 of NSW. As I said NSW has about <.4 ppm CO2, 94 % HCO3 - and 6 & CO3-. If you wanted to keep these ratios, yet raise the CO2 above NSW, just increasing the Alk will do this.
NSW, pH 8.3, Alk 2.25 meq / l = CO2 < .4 ppm
pH 8.3, Alk 4 meq/ l = .67 ppm CO2
If we now just drop that pH to 8.2 = .89 ppm CO2
and if we leave that Alk at 2.25 and drop the pH to 8.2 = .5 ppm CO2
and as this CO2 increases so is there an increase in HCO3 - and CO3--
This all looks like a good discussions and there just appears to be some simple misunderstands in the issues of relationships. What ever system works best for their needs is the one to choose. There is more than one way to skin a cat

I might add that one of the worlds foremost FW planted people does not even use CO2, she controls it with more fish = more CO2
