Dosing CO2??

Sarah et al,

I've been away doing research and playing with other things.
anyway, I've played with the growth of several macro algae and have some culturing methods to address.

I used CO2.
It did not do much relative to a control.
Actually nothing.

I did not predict this.
I predicted more growth.

This tank is packed also, so limitation may occur.

I also had a bought with cyano in another culture tank.
I tried quite a few things, made lots of mistakes on this tank in particular.

I tried every remedy for Red cyano and not one of them worked.
This was like the FW algae.

So I took FW approaches.

I reasoned that the focus should be on the plant/macro, not the noxious algae pest.

Adding CO2 did not help, nor any combo of ratios, etc, and I tried all sorts of antibiotics also etc, blackout worked well for 3 days but the cyano came right back, 3x a week 50-80% water changes never worked etc.

So what did work and amplified the growth a great deal?

Aeration, lots and lots of it.

You might not be aware of my old CO2 mist theory from the FW plant folks.

I can test it indirectly using O2 meters and CO2 [aq] measure.

But there is more to it in our case and the result is simpler in terms of a method for the macro algae hobby and I suspect seagrass strongly as well.

Cyano went away rapidly, never came back.
Plants have grown and looked very healthy.
I have very high biomass now.

I tried to filter all the detritus all also, that did not work either, but helped some against the Cyano and growth.

Steady NO3/Fe dosing helped, I also started PO4 dosing as the levels started to fall,m but that was only after heavily aerating.

So what is going on here?
The bubbles are sticky and they break up boundary layer around leaves/fronds. They also contain gas like CO2 and O2.
These are much faster in terms of Fick's 1st law of diffusion, for transfer.

This also mimics the ocean environment with the froath of bubbles near seagrass and a lot of macro habitats.

If you go inland on the bay side of Florida, you'll note how much more cyanos and diatoms you find, temp+low gas exchange is likely the cause.

Where there is higher current/aeration + plants, less cyano.
I saw this everywhere in FL, in CA, seagrasses are only found in higher light high aerated regions, which is all of CA coast:)

So this froath of aeration seems to produce the awesome growth.

I turned it off 4 times and waited, the growth reduces, and the O2 diurnal peak also declines(110% saturation to 95%), suggesting less growth. I also saw the return of pest algae.
Turning the aeration back on full blast: inside 1 week, the results returned to the original state and maintained strong resiliency.

I've done very well with macro algae growth in the past from tropical regions. I also had a skilter cranking in lot so aeration. The one problem tank also had a skilter, but the air intake kept getting salt spray and clogging. After addressing that and testing my hypothesis out a few times, it seems I can safely make some conclusions:

Stable high aeration is a key/significant part of heavy macro/seagrass growth.
This facilitates gas exchange and perhaps removes epiphytic pest/algae
Stable NO3 and Fe dosing are critical.
Ca and alk are also critical.
pH tends to be more stable
Bacteria tend to do better cycling.
Less detritus

I also recently developed and marine specific Fe supplement for marine plants/macro algae.

I do not sell fertilizers, but another vendor will be selling it dry and you can make up your own solutions.
It's about 20-100X less than commericial brands BTW and is specific to marine systems alk and pH, unlike most other products.
I have just started using this and am extremely pleased.

I am thinking of going back and attacking CO2 better using a gas tank etc.


Regards,
Tom Barr
 
Yea, I'm killing Calupera taxifolia with the state of CA and they have had lots of culture issues. Hard to show divers and do studies when it's got issues.

They had a guy before me that seems to have spent quite a bit of $ without any success. Some fiddling and tenacity and I got it back from nasty filth.

It's a weird plant, it'll grow great in the environment, but not as well in culture, which is odd, because.......it came from culture!!!

The chiller did nothing, many things did nothing.
I went back and forth a few times, as the Macros and noxious algae and epiphytes grow pretty fast, you can tell rather quickly if something works or not.

That's one advantage about growing macros and learning more.
Plants are slower to respond.

Regards,
Tom Barr
 
In my heavily planted SW tank, I've twice turned off the skimmer (a leftover from when it was a reef) only to turn it back on. It pulls out virtually no skimmate but my tank won't function without it. I've long suspected it is only working as an elaborate aerator.

I've thought about running a line from the CO2 canister that injects my FW tank, but I've never saw anything that I could pinpoint to a carbon defeciency. So for that reason alone I haven't bothered. To be fair I don't have any vasculars at the moment.
 
Often not reiverix as many marine pants use HCO3-. It is mostly unwanted plants that use CO2. However, a large use of HCO3- can still cause the pH to rise and they are converting HCO3- into CO2 = rising pH. If there in no pH issue then it is nothing to worry about.
 
Tom, Reiverix.

after a handful of macros came dead/dying I started reading.. I am trying to mimic the skilter effect right now by putting a sweetwater stone attached to 1/3 of the output of an airpump... near the hob filter intake of my 8 gallon (hopefully to be a macro /seahorse nano.

there are tons of bubbles. Far more than I ever had in fw co2.. and when i eventually get horses, I can dial this down some.. my question for now is will this alka selzter effect help my macros from what you know?

I am dosing no3 and put in a ricegrains worth of po4. tossed in some tropica too.

I am plant only for the moment so I can try just about anything.

when the horses come, would microbubbles be dangerous.. you hear a lot about 'gas bubble' disease, but lately that all seems to be an issue of infection, not actual bubbles.

have you tried misting with seahorses?
 
I've never tried misting with my seahorses and I'm not sure it's something I'd want to try either. I try to keep good gas exchange in the tank though.
 
Riev, for the moment the tank has only snails and plants.. so I'll use the mist to get it started.

when you do mist, how bubbly do you let it go? the sweetwater stone under the intake will let me do everything from a light snow to alka seltzer.
 
I can only talk from FW experience here. I use an ADA diffuser, which does produce very fine bubbles. The bubbles are blown around the tank via the outlet from a canister filter. Of course this is CO2 which can be dissolved quite easily in FW.

As far as mixing CO2 and saltwater goes, I know very little. I'll probably start experimenting one day and see how things go, but not in my seahorse tank though :)

I'm wondering if anyone here has tried Flourish Excel? It's a well known and popular substitute for CO2 in FW tanks. One side effect though, is that it is very harsh on some types of algae. Good for some tanks. Maybe not so good for the saltie side.
 
Sarah points out that Excel kills fw algae, and after using it to erradicate hair agae I can attest to the accuracy of this !

so I am worried about excel in a salt tank. but what I thought tom was talking about blowing into a Salt tank was Air -- and not pure co2 -- adding both some co2 and some o2 to a salt water tank..

maybe I'm getting confused?
 
Flourish Excel
A polymerized isomer of glutaraldehyde trademarked as polycycloglutaracetal by Seachem Laboratories, Inc. is the active ingredient in a product called Flourish Excel, a fertilizer for aquatic plants. It is claimed that it provides a bioavailable source of carbon for higher plants that is not available to algae. Though not marketed as such due to federal regulations, the biocidal effect of glutaraldehyde kills most algae at concentrations of 0.5 - 5.0 ppm. These levels are not harmful to most aquatic fauna and flora. Adverse reactions have been observed by some aquarists at these concentrations in some aquatic mosses,
 
Back
Top