Finally an easy solution to bryopsis!

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10786346#post10786346 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Johnsteph10
I thought my excellent husbandry skills had destroyed it! :lol:
Just lucky I guess... :D
 
There must be some other element in Tech-M. that is working and not the magnesium. cause i have gone through this whole thread and people that were boosting thier mag with mag flake are not having any success. just reading along tring to figure this out myself. i have not done any dosing yet.
 
I understand you should obviously never dose something unless you can adequately test for it, but many people just throw in a random amount hoping to supplement their systems, ... can someone tell me what happens if you do overdose your tank's magnesium levels?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10788654#post10788654 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by steve70
There must be some other element in Tech-M. that is working and not the magnesium.
Sulfate
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10789713#post10789713 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by skeeter-doc
I understand you should obviously never dose something unless you can adequately test for it, but many people just throw in a random amount hoping to supplement their systems, ... can someone tell me what happens if you do overdose your tank's magnesium levels?

While I've never taken levels as high as some have posted in this thread (1800 to 2000ppm), little has been reported regarding any type of damage to the system. Even at 1600ppm, my reef never displayed any issues.
 
I think I may have bryopsis and another algae that is more like a "tumbleweed". The tumbleweed algae is easy to remove almost coming off the sand and rock in clumps.

The other patches on the live rock however...must be bryopsis. Tough to pinch out with your fingers and a more dense low growth.

Here is a full tank shot showing the patches of algae. I had removed a good portion of the tumbleweed algae by hand. This is a "before" picture as I had a normal Mg level.
fts-8-19-07.jpg


I have been double dosing magnesium sulfate and have incresed the Mg to 1470ppm over the last week from about 1320ppm. I am just about out of the Seachem Reef Magnesium (ingredients listed as magnesium sulfate, sodium, chloride) so I will get some Tech M and try to zap this stuff! :strooper:
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10795114#post10795114 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by salty joe
Is there a test for sulphate?
Not for salt water that I know of. Most test kits test between 70 to 200 ppm while Sulphate content in NSW is around 2700 ppm.
You may try a fresh water test kit for sulphate with a range up to 200 ppm but you will need to dilute the sample 1:19 (1 sample and 19 RO/DI or distilled water) and multiply the result by 20.
 
Sammy the Seachem product is only around 10% magnesium sulfate, the other 90% is magnesium chloride, quite a few others on the thread have already discovered that magnesium chloride did nothing for the algae, regardless how high they took magnesium.
Dosing the Seachem product you may think you are dosing magnesium sulfate, but in fact you just cannot get enough magnesium sulfate in there, you are not shifting the ionic balance of the tank in favour of sulfate.
Go with Tech M, or alternatively Epsom salts is 100% magnesium sulfate.
 
Last edited:
If epsom salt is 100% magnesium sulphate, could you indirectly measure how much sulphate is being added by measuring the increase in mg?
 
Yes but someone with more chemistry knowledge than me would have to give you the formula.

Perhaps the RC chemistry forum would be a good place to ask.
 
Epsom Salts is Magnesium Sulfate Heptahydrate which is: MgSO4·7H2O whose molecular weight is 246.4 or 246.4 grams per mol.
Ot of this total 24.3 grams is Magnesium (9.9% Mg), 96.1 grams is Sulfate (39 % SO4) and the remining 126 grams is water (51.1% H2O)

So the ratio by weight of Sulphate to Magnesium is 96.1 to 24.3 or
3.955 to 1
In other words for every 1 ppm of Magnesium you increase you will roughly increase Sulphate by 4 ppm.

As Natural Sea Water contains about 2710 ppm of Sulfate it is possible to calculate the % increase in sulfate with a one shot increase of magnesium.
This Table from one of Randy's article can give you a good comparison

<center>Table 5. Sulfate Increase from a Single Magnesium Boost Using Magnesium Sulfate.</center>
<center>(Results are not corrected for salinity changes.) </center>
Magnesium       Starting Sulfate      Final Sulfate       Sulfate Rise
Boost (ppm)&nbsp     &nbsp (ppm)nbsp;  (ppm)   (%)
      50       2710       2908
      7%
100 2710 3105 15%
200 2710 3500 29%
300 2710 3895 44%
 
Last edited:
Hmmm... Impressive Jdieck!

bigthumbup.gif




Would also be interesting to find out the exact level sulfate has to be to do the job although that might be hard cos you would have to know the starting sulfate.

And that is of course assuming that it actually is the sulfate that is killing the algae, although having read the whole thread & seeing what works for people it would seem that is likely.
 
I used ESV liquid magnesium and Seachem Reef Advantage Magnesium, for 3 weeks 1600 mg/l, didn't worked. Still have bryosis. Resistant kind?

And, reading from the label on the Seachem Reef Mg, at the left: "...blend of magnesium, chloride, and sulphate salts....", on the right, very fine print: "Ingredients: Magnesium sulfate, sodium chloride".

I too thought, that it is the blend of MgSo4 and MgCl2....
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10813843#post10813843 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by dendro982
I used ESV liquid magnesium and Seachem Reef Advantage Magnesium, for 3 weeks 1600 mg/l, didn't worked. Still have bryosis. Resistant kind?

And, reading from the label on the Seachem Reef Mg, at the left: "...blend of magnesium, chloride, and sulphate salts....", on the right, very fine print: "Ingredients: Magnesium sulfate, sodium chloride".

I too thought, that it is the blend of MgSo4 and MgCl2....
Thanks that explains a lot regarding the composition of Seachem's
Given the ingredients, they are using Magnesium Sulfate but not Magnesium Chloride but instead they use Sodium Chloride. IMO as a Magnesium Supplement it has advantages and disadvantages.
The advantage is that most contaminants specially Ammonia comes from the manufacturing of Magnesium Chloride so by not using it they insure higher purity, the cons is that they need to balance the increase in Shulphate with increases in Sodium and Chloride ions something they achieve by using Sodium Chloride but this creates one pro and two cons, the pro is that they will balance sodium which supplements with magnesium chloride will not but one of the cons will be that the product will be more dilute for Magnesium so more of it is required to achieve the same Mg increase than with a supplement that contains Mg Sulfate and Mg Chloride and the second is that in large corrections it might increase salinity a little bit but I doubt in an amount noticeable by most refractometers.
So in summary it is better balanced, might be higher purity but will be more dilute.
Regarding if it affects Bryopsis it will be imposible to know, at least at this point is seems that does not which leeads me to believe that the effect on bryopsis does not come from either sulfate nor chloride but rather either the magnesium level itself or some impurity in a particular supplement or a combination of both.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10814081#post10814081 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jdieck
Thanks that explains a lot regarding the composition of Seachem's
Given the ingredients, they are using Magnesium Sulfate but not Magnesium Chloride but instead they use Sodium Chloride. IMO as a Magnesium Supplement it has advantages and disadvantages.
The advantage is that most contaminants specially Ammonia comes from the manufacturing of Magnesium Chloride so by not using it they insure higher purity, the cons is that they need to balance the increase in Sulfate with increases in Sodium and Chloride ions something they achieve by using Sodium Chloride but this creates one pro and two cons, the pro is that they will balance sodium which supplements with magnesium chloride will not but one of the cons will be that the product will be more dilute for Magnesium so more of it is required to achieve the same Mg increase than with a supplement that contains Mg Sulfate and Mg Chloride and the second is that in large corrections it might increase salinity a little bit but I doubt in an amount noticeable by most refractometers.
So in summary it is better balanced, might be higher purity but will be more dilute.
Regarding if it affects Bryopsis it will be impossible to know, at least at this point is seems that does not which leads me to believe that the effect on bryopsis does not come from either sulfate nor chloride but rather either the magnesium level itself or some impurity in a particular supplement or a combination of both.

Just a note on the above. Although this formulation of Magnesium Sulfate with Sodium Chloride may balance better by adding some Sodium, given the concentration of Magnesium in Seachems Magnesium supplement of 7.97% if using Magnesium Sulfate Hexahydrate the ratio of the formulation by weight will be about 4.2 of Mg Sulfate Hexa and 1 of Sodium Chloride.
This will give a ratio of Sodium to Sulfate of about .24 to 1 when NSW is about 4:1 and a ratio of Chloride to Sulfate of 0.57 when the ratio in NSW is 7:1
If the formulation uses Magnesium Sulfate Anhydrous the ratio improves a little bit to 0.75:1 for Sodium:Sulfate and 1.16:1 for Chloride:Sulfate; still far from the required 4:1 and 7:1 to be fully balanced.
On the other hand although a supplement containing a 10:1 mix of Mag Chloride and Mg Sulfate will not contain any sodium it will balance the Chloride to Sulfate on the required 7:1 ratio.

In summary, in my opinion (and I might be wrong) although Seachem's contain some sodium and chloride ions and may reduce the risk of impurities the supplement is not necessarily better balanced than a 10:1 supplement of Mg Chloride and Mg Sulfate
 
Back
Top