Cool topic. How about this scenario:
A standard, off-the-shelf 8-outlet surge protector plugged into a non-GFCI wall outlet. Eight in-line GFCI cords plugged into the surge protector. Eight pieces of tank equipment (lights, powerheads, etc.) plugged into the in-line GFCI cords.
As I understand the situation, the in-line GFCI cords would be running in parallel to each other. Therefore, each in-line GFCI cord would only react if the piece of equipment plugged into that cord passed current to ground. If something were to trip one of the GFCIs while you weren't around, you'd come home to find one component of the tank not running, rather than the entire tank shut down.
Would this work?
My reasoning: My living room (where the tanks are) doesn't have GFCI outlets. I already have a couple of surge bars, and I don't want to put everything on a single GFCI. Therefore, if I put each piece of equipment on its own GFCI, I'm golden. Yes? No? Maybe?
A standard, off-the-shelf 8-outlet surge protector plugged into a non-GFCI wall outlet. Eight in-line GFCI cords plugged into the surge protector. Eight pieces of tank equipment (lights, powerheads, etc.) plugged into the in-line GFCI cords.
As I understand the situation, the in-line GFCI cords would be running in parallel to each other. Therefore, each in-line GFCI cord would only react if the piece of equipment plugged into that cord passed current to ground. If something were to trip one of the GFCIs while you weren't around, you'd come home to find one component of the tank not running, rather than the entire tank shut down.
Would this work?
My reasoning: My living room (where the tanks are) doesn't have GFCI outlets. I already have a couple of surge bars, and I don't want to put everything on a single GFCI. Therefore, if I put each piece of equipment on its own GFCI, I'm golden. Yes? No? Maybe?