GoBigOrGoHome
New member
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13384696#post13384696 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by serpentman
He guys, I hate to be nitpicky on the whole PAR debate. However, I respectfully disagree with notion that PAR directly translates to Light intensity.
PAR, by definition, is "Photosynthetically Available Radiation", or light in the range of 400-700nm. Although visible light falls in this range, that is not the intention of this measurement. Without consideration to photosynthesis, either by terrestrial plants, zooanthellae, algae, etc, it is a useless value.
Light intensity in the traditional sense is more correctly measured in lumens which is the unit of measurement of luminous flux or a measure of perceived power of light by the human eye across the visible light spectrum. Basically its measurement of the amount of all available visible light. And finally Lux is perceived visible light intensity that hits a given surface.
Granted, for our purposes in the hobby, PAR is the ultimate goal and is really what should be concentrated on. Although a technicality, PAR really does not really equal light intensity but rather intensity that is experienced by corals, or more specifically zooanthellae.
Given the natural source of energy provided by solar radiation, my bet is the solar tubes actually provide a greater source of PAR across the available light spectrums. Manmade lights although handy, struggle to effectively hit the entire spectrum. Given the available energy, they must specialize at a specific frequency, often at the expense of other areas of the spectrum.
A more elaborate form of what I was getting at.