Cool! I *wish* I could NOT feel guilty about freely distributing Sadovy's article as it WAS given to my by someone else who had access to it, but knowing how nasty I get when defending my own copywritten materials, I just *can't* justify it

Public Library..there's a good way to get it without shelling out $30!
FWIW, I did a "headcount" and made it up to around 23 or so. It really neat that I can simply turn the flashlight on and usually find 1 or 2 larvae in the beam at any given moment.
I'm still trying to figure out - my last random sampling prior to hatch had 1/3 viable eggs. While I'm no pro at this (in fact it's been YEARS since I bothered doing this type of stuff) here's what I've come up with.
Population Size = I marked this down as a good sized spawn, 400-500 eggs, but as with most all the spawns I didn't count. I harvested about 1/2 gallon of water, so I may have only had more like 200-300 eggs, but again, I varied the harvest method on some of the "late floaters" via using a pipette instead of a jar to get them out. So let's say 400 eggs.
I sampled 15, so the margin of error is around 24%. In my sample, I had 33% viable eggs +- 24% then...so to extrapolate based on a population of 400, I had somewhere between 36 and 228 eggs that were viable. So in theory there should be at LEAST 30+ larvae in the tank right now IF I had 400 eggs. If I ditch the margin of error and just extrapolate from thesample, I *should* have around 132 larvae...I definitely don't have that many in my opinion.
Overall, I have a feeling that something is still getting in the way of the early egg development. I'm hoping that simple sterile water is really all it ends up taking...I clearly had a good hatch without ANY circulation other than a steady air feed in one corner of the tank...heck I found larvae in the miniscus earlier today so eggs getting "stuck" on the sides didn't really seem to be a problem. If this batch keeps going and I get future spawns, they're going to go straight into sterile water in whatever will hold them with a slow air feed because it really looks like that's all it takes afterall?! Yes, I'm basing this off one good hatch from a group of eggs that got totally "mistreated" in the flow-through kriesel; if I can replicate this a couple more times I think we'll be onto something.
Here's what I AM comfortable in concluding - INCUBATION method really doesn't seem to be all that important! Kriesel, Stirrer, or tank with air feed, all have produced at least one 'double digit' hatch. Going back to the one good hatch with the kriesel, I'm pretty sure that was in a tank with freshly mixed water that had gone in earlier that day or the day before..in other words a pretty clean environment. This latest hatch, same deal. I think ED is definitely onto something with regards to fugus/bacteria getting in the way of things going normally.
Well, while I eagerly await the first true feeding of SS-Strain Rotifers and T-Iso, I can only hope for more spawns in the coming months to try out with sterile water. If I can start getting hatches at least this size it will be workable (i.e. I don't think placing smaller larvae in with older siblings is going to pose any major problems).
Settlement is only 11 to 13 days away now...I can hardly wait. DARNIT I have two trips out of town this week...NOT GOOD but I think I can leave the babies in good hands (if they make it that far).
GROW UP ALREADY (a directive to the baby mandarins)!
MP