How does that rule out H. magnifica. Neither E. quadricolor nor H. magnifican have any verrucae. The tentacles have the look of H. magnifica instead of E. quaduadricolor<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8266900#post8266900 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Amphiprion
I am having a difficult time finding any verrucae on the underside of this anemone, so at first glance, I don't think it is H. magnifica. It just looks like a very nicely colored E. quadricolor to me. a better pic of the underside and the presence or absence of verrucae will give a more definite ID.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8267248#post8267248 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by OrionN
How does that rule out H. magnifica. Neither E. quadricolor nor H. magnifican have any verrucae. The tentacles have the look of H. magnifica instead of E. quaduadricolor
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8270339#post8270339 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Coralgrabber
it looks just like that.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8270327#post8270327 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by phender
I can't believe you guys are arguing about an ID on an anemone that is totally deflated and not showing many identifying characteristics of either species.But since your are, here is my opinion.
Its a BTA. The fact that is the result of a split is also good but not conclusive evidence.
The tentacle color and shape look very similar to a BTA I sold recently.
Deflated:
![]()
Inflated:
![]()
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8270522#post8270522 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Amphiprion
I wasn't arguing about the identity of the anemone (note I said at first glance)--but rather, I gave my opinion and both anemones' identifying characteristics.