Re: Bravo? nonsense...
Re: Bravo? nonsense...
Has it come to this already? Normally I do not like to rant, but this is something I feel strongly about.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8474811#post8474811 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by nodea717
So much to offer... but So conceited...
This makes me sad. Mr. Delbeek is one of Hawaii's most knowledgeable and respected aquarists, and we can do better than alienating people like him with petty insults. As somebody to whom our hobby is a full-time job, he has a perspective that most of us lack.
Charles has pointed out something that is plainly obvious: people on this thread have openly admitted to breaking state and federal laws. I do not need to quote them; their posts stick out like sore thumbs in the first two pages of this thread and looking them up is easy. This is not a trivial matter; people
have served jail time in Hawaii for this and there are people on this island who would be very happy to see you punished for it. Discussing this sort of thing here, or trying to swap non-native coral frags at club meetings (as one poster did indeed suggest) is a bad idea for their own sake.
While that may sound harsh, it's the plain truth and there's no sense sugar-coating it. Most of us understand this and are willing to work with the system instead of against it, but apparently not everyone does. This can only serve to reinforce the negative opinions that many people have of aquariums.
As far as laws and regulations, don't expect those to change for a long time, if ever, thats just the way it works.
I respectfully disagree. This being a democratic society, laws stem from the concerns of the people. The anti-aquarium laws that we now have arose by this process - the people of Hawaii recognized that intact reefs were important for our lifestyle and economy. Taking live rock and breaking coral can be extremely destructive activities, and we are much better off now that they're prohibited. In the '60s and '70s, it was common for divers to demolish entire coral heads in search of rare shells and other specimens!
Will a small number of aquarium hobbyists taking small amounts of live rock and coral fragments for their own personal use really damage the environment? Of course not, but the powers that be will not recognize that unless it can be demonstrated by people like us. If we make our voices heard, the regulations can reflect our interests as well, although it may not happen overnight.
As it stands, collecting corals and live rock can be done legally with the proper permits. As a matter of fact, I have a permit that allows me to collect live rock for research purposes (I work at UH), although obviously I can't use it in my aquarium. Scientists here routinely collect corals and live rock, which they are allowed to do because the state feels their activities are beneficial and outweigh the potential cost. I believe it is possible to demonstrate that our hobby is an asset to our state rather than a burden.
Regarding invertebrates, many can reproduce asexually and there may be more risk of them becoming established than with fish. IMO enjoying introduced species in aquaria is something that should only be permitted if there are careful provisions to prevent their escape.
Here is a good article about how
deep reef habitats in Hawaii are being overgrown by an introduced soft coral. This is something that I have seen personally, and it breaks my heart. It is part of my job at UH to review video records from our submersibles, including some of the dives mentioned in the article. Seeing once-thriving forests of black coral trees lifeless and engulfed by snowflake coral is an awesome sight; one which we should avoid repeating at all costs.