<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6828222#post6828222 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by MSM All of these diverse responses (3.75 to 15.8) help to show that watts per gallon is a poor "rule of thumb" for lighting.
As many have stated before, dont get hung up on the whole WPG thing, its more about intensity and spread.
I run 2x250W XM10K in Lumenarc III"s with 420W VHO over my 225gl.
That puts me at 4 WPG.
But Im sure I could have the same growth with out my VHO's so you could say I can have a WPG of 2.2.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.