ich questions

michealprater

Angelfish Nerd
Premium Member
I had a Red Sea Regal on order for over 2 months. I had the QT setup for him. I figured it would still be awhile for the Regal, so in the meantime I decided to order a pair of Potters angels, and wouldn't you know it, the day they came in, so did my regal. The potters had came from a medicated system, so not wanting to put 3 angels in my 46 gallon QT, I opted to put the potters from the medicated system in my frag tank that is tied in with my display. The regal went in QT. One day later the male potters was covered in white spots and appeared to be ich. As soon as I seen it, I pulled the potters, and got them setup in the qt with the Regal in which is medicated with Cupramine and Prazipro. Within hours the Potters was free of spots. They will be there for 6 weeks now.

Now is where I start to panic. Basically once ich has been introduced to the tank, is it ever possible for it to go away without removing all living items from the tank? Fish, crabs, snails, and coral. I have a large 250 gallon tank that I would have to completely break down to get the yellow tang, coral beauty, percula and blue face angel out. The blue face did have one white spot last night. I am worried that I just basically ruined my tank. The potters were only in my tank for 24 hrs, is it possible for the ich to spread in that time. Considering the fish had just started to show spots?

I am kicking myself, I have been doing this long enough to know better, and bad timing caused me to make a stupid decision. At the time it seemed to be the lesser of two evils.

Any advise is appreciated. Thanks.
 
All fish would need to come out for a minimum 8 weeks imo..corals and inverts are not hosts to ich. Really no other way to be "positive". Course many treat their DT with "reef" safe meds but I personally do not think there is such a thing.

Would definately hate to be in your spot trying to catch them though..:(
 
If all the fish in the tank remain healthy and do not show visible signs of ich, that does not mean it is not there correct?
 
I guess to simplify. I screwed up, is there any way to avoid ripping my reef apart. If not, then so be it. Just thought I would see what everyone said.
 
The answer I got on another site from a "very" well known reef guru is..that it is possible for a balance to be struck in your tank and that the current fish could become immune, but any future additions would be extremely vulnerable and may be attack in force. It is recommended that QT be followed..hth
 
Ick can be introduced in many ways. Introducing new fish (even if you QT), stress or bad water chemistry. I think that introduction of new fish and stress are the number one culprits. My friend's fire goby get one or two spots a few hours after he does a water change but it goes away the next morning.

I actually gone through an ick problem myself about a week ago. When I first started my FOWLR tank, I had a Humu trigger that came down with ick not too long after I put him in. Now being that it was a FOWLR it was ok to dose with meds but I feared that I would kill my LR, which I was not to fond of doing. But, I ended up dosing with Rid Ick+ and all my fish came out ok.

But now after going through another round of Ick due to putting a scopas tang (ick magents) in my DT. He came down with ick about a 4 days after I put him in. I don't want to put any meds in my tank anymore so I am soaking all the food with garlic and selcon to boost their immune system and hoping that the tang can fight it off on its own. None of my other fish have spots so something worked. The Scopas tang is also showing no more ich after about 8 days or so. But, I still feeding soaked food. I have read and talked to numerous reefers and basically said that if all your fish are healthy, eating well, and not stressed, they should be able to fight it off w/o any meds.

Watch your other fish in DT and if you see other fish start showing signs of ich, then you have choice to make, try to get all your fish out and leave your tank fishless for 10-12 wks or longer, since ick needs fish for a host or take the huge risk with "reef-safe" meds and dose your DT. IMHO, one spot on a fish is nothing to panic about at the moment, they'll be able to fight it off with good nutritious food but numerous spots on a numerous fishes, then you have a problem. So, if you can wait it out before making any drastic measures, pls do so. But if it gets worse in the next day or two, then make your decision. Hope this helps. :D
 
Last edited:
Simply if you keep your fish in the tank without letting it go fallow, you will always have ich , which will attack stressed fishes, it will remain as a low level infection in the aquarium, not always noticeable until an outbreak.

Ich spores can even be introduced via liverock, coral, macro algae if they have been nearby any infected fish but if nothing "wet" at all is added to the aquarium for over a year, the ich will eventually die out as it can only go through a certain number of cell divisions before it dies of "old age"
 
I understand if there is fish, and there is ich, as long as there is fish, there will always be ich and any stress fish will be at risk. Even if the healthy fish do not show signs, they can still carry it. I think I am screwed.
 
you arent screwed it is quite possible to keep fish healthy and alive for their natural lifespan even with low level of ich present in the aquarium , remove stress maintain good water quality and you should be fine
 
If you QT your existing fish and treat them and let your DT go fallow for around 8 weeks, you have/can effectively break the life cycle of ich. They will die off and the chance of reinfection is slim to none if proper care is taken with any new addition, coral and all. Is what I did 3 years ago and no issues since with a lot of new additions..hth
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15118760#post15118760 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Ohiomom
If you QT your existing fish and treat them and let your DT go fallow for around 8 weeks, you have/can effectively break the life cycle of ich. They will die off and the chance of reinfection is slim to none if proper care is taken with any new addition, coral and all. Is what I did 3 years ago and no issues since with a lot of new additions..hth

This would require a complete teardown of a large reef. Both angels rarely come out of the rocks.
 
yeap I understand..but only way to be relatively sure or you take your chances..imo..lesser of two evils I guess.
 
Ick

Ick

This is what works for me.Lots of clean up crew (10 pep,5 cleaner shrimp,3 emerald and 30 blue leg hermit crabs), run skimmer wet, micron filter, and soak food in garilc.My hippo always has something on her but all the other fish scopas,powder blue,chromis,clown,etc. always seem to be fine. The last thing I would do is break it down. I've always lost more fish from stress trying to get them out then just letting it run its course. For me its impossible to get them out once I put them in my 200 with all the rock. Hope this helps good luck and don't sweat it, it always goes away.
 
Here is some information taken from another site that was written by Lee Birch. Pretty much confirms my fears.

Marine Ich (Cryptocaryon irritans)

One of the marine aquarist’s devils. So many articles have been written about it. Many are long or are in multiple parts. A lot is known about this marine fish disease because of the many $$$ put into research by the fish farming and aquaculture industries. First discovered (or the better word is 'noticed') in the 1800's and later more understood in the 1900's, we’ve learned about all there is to know about this parasite by the 2000's.

I don’t want to write a long post on Marine Ich (MI) but the reader, in as brief of space as possible, should know some truths. The aquarist 'sees something' and then 'guesses' as to what it means and thus starts another round of rumors. It's almost a type of voodoo. It's easier to listen to a rumor of a short absolute statement then it is to read and understand the results of decades of studies and experiments. It is easier to try and take shortcuts with this disease by believing the parasite to be able or capable to do things or die from things it just can't, then it is to do the work to kill it, control it, or prevent it by the means that are known to work.

It's time to separate out the rumors from the facts and the subjective observations (which start rumors) from actual scientific studies. In bullet form, here’s what is known:


Life and Visuals:

1, The parasite has several ‘stages’ in its life cycle. Cyst in aquarium (usually on substrate, decoration, wall, equipment, or rock) ruptures into free-swimming parasites that burrow into fish, grow into a visible white nodule that is ‘pregnant’ with more parasites, that usually falls off the fish to form a cyst that releases more free-swimming parasites and starts the cycle over again.

2. Only time a human can see this parasite with the naked eye is when it is ‘pregnant’ on the fish and has formed a white nodule. (The white spot is about the size of a grain of table salt or sugar). [NOT ALL WHITE SPOTS MEAN MARINE ICH].

3. Parasites that have just burrowed into the fish are not visible until 2.

4. Cycle can be completed in less than 7 days, but usually within 24 days BUT can go as long as 72 days. Literature usually quotes ‘average’ number of days. 72 days is rare; 60 days usually encompasses more than 99.9% of the observations and research.

5. This is not the same as the freshwater disease, Ich (Ichthyophthirius multifilis) but it was named after it?! This leads freshwater aquarists to thinking the wrong things about Marine Ich, adding to the myths and rumors.

6. MI is not very sensitive to temperature changes. That is, increasing the temperature does not significantly decrease the life cycle time. This is not true with Freshwater Ich (which is where this rumor of raising the temperature on a marine aquarium with MI comes from).

7. MI can live and reproduce in temperatures as low as 50F and as high as 90F. Thus temperatures that would kill MI would first kill or severely stress most tropical marine fishes.

8. Spots appear then disappear as MI goes through its cycle. Remember 2. This 'disappearing act' is what leads uninformed aquarists to believe the fish are cured. This is the dumbest thing aquarists can possibly think about this parasite!

9. Parasites seem to come in two types: one that only infects gills and one that infects gills and the fish’s body. The tissue of the gills has more exposure to the parasites because a lot of water goes by the gills as the fish ‘breathes’ or ‘swallows.’ Thus, there is an increase in chance the free-swimming parasite will get to the gill. This is one reason why fast breathing (over 90 swallows in one minute) is one of the symptoms of possible infection.

10. The parasite burrows into the fish, below the mucous layer and into the skin or gill itself. (This is why cleaner fish/shrimp can’t get to it in order to remove them from the fish). The second dumbest thing an aquarist can think: I'll get some cleaner fish or cleaner shrimp to remove/eat the parasite. THESE MARINES DO NOT EAT THE MI PARASITE NOR WILL FISH OR SHRIMP REMOVE THE PARASITE FROM THE INFECTED FISHES. Research has shown that the intestinal tracks of cleaner fish and shrimp do not contain MI parasites - - these lifeforms don’t eat MI off of infected fishes.

11. Parasite is transmitted in water (free-swimming and cyst stages), or by falling off of an infected fish (even one that seems healthy because of 9.). This means that water OR fish from another aquarium can carry the disease to another aquarium.

12. The parasite can infect bony fishes, including eels, sharks, and rays, though many species of fish, like Mandarins, have a good resistance to MI, they can still be infected and can harbor or carry the parasite. Invertebrates, snails, crabs, corals, plants, etc. are not affected/infected by MI, but the MI can be in their water, shells, etc.

13. There is no such thing as a dormant stage for MI. The parasite can’t wait around for another host. It MUST go through its cycle. Dr. Burgess recorded that in the cyst stage, he found the longest existing cyst to last for 60 days before releasing the free-swimming parasites. This is rare but possible. This led to the recommendation by many to allow 8 weeks for a fishless tank to be rid of this parasite.

14. INTERESTING FIND: If no new MI is introduce into an infected aquarium, the MI already there continues to cycle through multiple generations until about 10 to 11 months when the MI has ‘worn itself out’ and becomes less infective. A tank can be free of an MI infestation if it is never exposed to new MI parasites for over 11 months.


Treatments:

1. Hyposalinity - Using a refractometer, hold salinity at 11ppt to 12ppt until 4 weeks after the last spot was seen. (Best to use salinity, but if you use specific gravity, that equates to roughly 1.008 to 1.009 sp. gr. units). Raise salinity slowly and observe fish for 4 more weeks. Hard to control pH and water quality during treatment. This is the least stressful treatment for the fish. See: A Fish Hyposalinity Treatment

2. Copper treatment - Follow medication recommendations. Can be effective in 2 to 4 weeks of treatment. After treatment, remove all copper and observe fish for 4 more weeks. Copper is a poison to the fish and creates some stress. The fish may stop eating. See end of this post for other things that can go wrong. See: Copper Medications - Good, Bad, and Ugly.

3.. Transfer method - Fish is moved from tank to tank to separate the fish from the cysts that fall off and the free-swimming stages of the parasite. Two hospital tanks are needed to perform this treatment. The fish is stressed by having to keep moving it between these hospital tanks.

4. Only the above 3 known cures work almost 100% of the time. Other chemicals will kill the MI parasite, but only in special conditions (not good for the fish) or in lab experiments (not using marine fish). Some chemicals will only kill some of the organisms, letting the others escape death to go on to multiply and infect.

5. Not any of the treatments can be done in a display tank with true live rock. Must be done in a hospital tank or quarantine tank. The hyposalinity and the copper treatment would kill invertebrates, live rock, and other non-fish marine life. Substrates and carbonates interfere with a copper treatment.

6. No known ‘reef-safe’ remedies work consistently. Many aquarists think a particular remedy works when in fact the fish acquire an immunity or defense against the parasite. It’s easy for any manufacturer to have an independent study done on the effectiveness of the ‘reef-safe’ remedy but they don’t because. . .

7. Cleaner shrimp and cleaner wrasses are not known to pick these parasites off of fish. (See 10. above).

8. Freshwater dips can kill some of the parasites on/in the fish, but not all of them because many of the parasites are protected by the fish's skin and mucous layer. (See 10. above).

9. No dip can get rid of these parasites because primarily of 10. above.

10. Let aquarium go fishless (without any foreign saltwater additions (e.g., water from LFS system, water from another tank or system -- use only distilled or RO/DI for evaporation and freshly made, uncontaminated salt water for water changes), without contamination from infected tanks, live rock additions, etc.) for at least 8 weeks and the tank will be free of MI. This 'fallow period' has over a 99.9% chance of success.

11. NEVER combine a copper treatment with a hyposalinity treatment. pH is hard to control in a hyposaline solution. If the pH drops, the copper complexed with water carbonates becomes 'free' and raises the copper content the fish is exposed to. The effect is similar to to overdosing with copper. Not worth the risk. Since they both cure Marine Ich, use one or the other and don't put so much stress on the fish (and yourself).


Defense and Immunity:

1. The fish’s mucous coating can provide some protection from the parasite. The mucous coating is where some fish immunity develops.

2. When water temperature drops, mucous coating is often reduced or lost in marine fishes, that is why sometimes MI becomes visible on the body of the fish after a sudden drop in temperature. This meant, however, that the disease was present and living in the aquarium, infecting fish without the aquarist having been aware of it.

3. No fish, no matter how good its defense is, can stop being infected. A healthy fish will and can be equally infected as a sick or stressed fish. What happens is the aquarists sees one or more fish with the disease and assumes because none are seen on the other fish in the aquarium that they are 'disease free.' NOT. Aquarists can't always see the parasites. See above top, 2., 3., and 9. All fish in an infected tank require treatment. MI is not and opportunistic pathogen - - It can and does infect healthy, unstressed fishes.

4. A weak, stressed, or sick fish will die sooner than a healthy fish, but is no more likely to get infected than the healthy fish.

5. A fish that survives an attack may develop proteins (also in the mucous coating) that will help fend off the parasite (this is a type of immune response). An immune fish will not get infected. Unfortunately. . .(see 6. below). . .

6. An immune fish doesn’t remain immune. Separated from the disease for months, the once immune fish can become MI infected.

7. Immunization seems to work, but not affordable or likely available to the hobby for many more decades. The immunization materials are hard to make, expensive, and slow to produce. Unfortunately, like it states in 6. above, the immunity is short-lived.


Subjective and Non-Subjective Observations, Claims, and Common Myths

1. Tangs seem more susceptible. True. Their mucous coatings are reduced in thickness and composition. They swim up to 25 miles a day in the ocean in search for food so maybe Mother Nature provided them with this as a means of 'escaping' being reinfected by the free-swimming parasites.

2. It goes away on its own. Untrue. Only visible at one stage IF it is on the body or fin of the fish. It’s the life cycle. If it was once seen, then it hasn't gone away -- it's just not visible to the aquarist.

3. It goes away with a ‘reef-safe’ remedy. Untrue. This is one of the biggest and most 'dangerous' of the misrepresentations in the hobby. The aquarist thinks everything is okay when it isn't. What usually has happened is that the parasite has killed the fish it will kill and the rest have developed a resistance or immunity. OR the strain of MI turns to infecting the gills only where the only stage of it can’t be seen by the hobbyist. The parasite is still in the aquarium.

4. It was gone then when a new fish is added, it is there again. Not true. See 3. It wasn’t gone or the new fish brought in the disease with it. A new addition to an aquarium can be the stress which triggers the other fish to reduce their defense or immunity, thus allow the parasite to 'bloom' to the point where the infection is now visible to the aquarist.

5. The fish lived the last outbreak then died during the second or subsequent outbreak. Can be true. The fish had a resistance or immunity that it lost.

6. It was diagnosed as MI spots, then never showed up again. It wasn’t MI or the fish quickly developed an immediate immunity or resistance, or the fish is still infected in the gills.

7. MI can ‘hang around’ almost unnoticed with just a body spot now and then because it often resides just in the gills. True. So ‘it is gone’ after ‘it was here’ is very unlikely.

8. Aquariums always have MI. Untrue. MI can be kept out of an aquarium. Just quarantine all fish and don’t let non-quarantined livestock get into the aquarium. After keeping thousands of marine fishes, my home aquariums have been free of MI since 1970.

9. Fish always have MI. Untrue. In the wild they often show up to 30% infected (or more) but the wild fish survive minor infections. In the tank the parasite can 'bloom.' In the tank the fish can't get away. The combination of bloom and no escape will overcome the fish. In capture and transportation the fish can share the disease and thus many wild caught marine aquarium fishes do have this parasite, but not all.

10. Like 9. a fish can't be made to be totally rid of MI. Untrue. All marine fish can be cured and rid of any MI infection.

11. Just feed the fish well and/or feed it garlic and it will be okay. Untrue. I compare this approach to this one: "Granny has pneumonia. Let's keep her home rather than take her to the hospital. We'll feed her well with chicken soup and vitamins -- and lots of garlic." :looney: Nutrition, foods, garlic, vitamins don't cure an infected fish. An infected fish is sick and is being tortured by the itching and discomfort. Don't let this happen to the fish. Cure it!! :thumbs:

12. A new cure has been discovered. Unlikely. If the aquarist thinks they have found a new cure, then have it researched and independently tested. It's easy and cheap. If it is as good as the above 3 then the professional veterinarians, private and public aquariums, fish farms, and I will use it. The aquarist needs to keep the perspective of how devastating this parasite is not to just the hobby but to the whole fish farming industry. Any new way of 100% treatment will make headlines!

13. If the MI can't always be detected, then why bother with a quarantine procedure? In the confines of a small quarantine and being there for no less than 6 weeks, the MI parasite will make itself known because the fish is weakened and the fish can't get away from being re-infected by multiplying MI parasites. In other words, the quarantine procedure instigates a 'bloom' of the parasite which will make it visible to the aquarist.

14. All white nodules fall off the fish and move on to the cyst stage. Untrue. It has been discovered that, on very rare occasions (why we don't know) the white nodule will encyst and rupture while still on the fish.

15. UV and/or Ozone kills MI. Ozone doesn't kill all parasites that pass through the unit, nor does the water treated with ozone kill the parasites. UV only kills the parasites that pass through the unit. Not all MI parasites will pass through the unit, so the UV will not rid an aquarium of MI. A UV can help prevent a 'bloom' of the parasites however, and thus help in its control. UV is not a cure nor a preventative measure for MI.

16. Spots are MI. Untrue. Probably one of the most problematic causes for rumors and myth-information in the hobby is assuming the spot is Marine Ich when it may be one of another few dozen other parasites or conditions (e.g., pimple-like reaction to infection) that look like Marine Ich. The mis-diagnosis is often the cause for claims of what cured MI, when the fish didn't have MI to start with.

17. My LFS quarantines their fishes for 2 weeks and I only buy them to be sure they are healthy and free of MI. Have you been reading the above? The 2 weeks is not long enough. Was the 2 weeks in isolation or is the fish's water mixed with other fish's water? Seeing is not believing, right? The truth is out there. . .Trust no one.

18. New reports indicate that there are forms of MI parasites that can survive in low salinity. True. In brackish waters there are variants of the parasite that can live in salinity as low as 5-8 ppt. Then why should we still count upon hyposalinity as a treatment? Easy. The variant in brackish waters is not the variant in natural sea water (35ppt). A marine fish has the MI variant adapted to 35ppt. So when hyposalinity is used on this parasite - it works.

19. The parasite can adapt to low salinity and it can survive a hyposalinity treatment. Highly unlikely. The parasite can adapt. Mother Nature likes to throw genetic variants into the mix when life reproduces. The theory is to give the organism a chance to survive (natural selection) in a changing environment. When the salinity is lowered to about 11-12ppt in the treatment tank, the MI cysts and free-swimming parasites don’t have the time to go through an adjustment. The sudden shift in salinity puts too much stress on the parasite. They are not able to ‘suddenly’ adapt. Remember those parasites that do live in low salinity got there slowly and are not the same ones on our marine fishes. See 18. above.

Was written by Lee Birch, not myself.
 
Thanks for the very informative post. It helped uncover a lot of truth to this very annoying parasite.

Has any of your other fish in your DT showing signs of ich since you taken the two angels out of your tank?
 
I only reposted someone elses work, but I am glad it was helpful.

The Regal has been in the QT since I got him and he has had 2 spots on the fin on his right side. However he is being medicated with Cupramine.

My other worry is the blueface in the tank on his left side he has some irregularities and one bump that is translucent. It looks like a loose scale. I am assuming it is flukes. I have a large bottle of Prazipro coming in the mail, and will dose my display with it. No signs of ich in the display as of right now, however the fish I have in there are very healthy, so the may be infected without showing any signs.
 
I just had an outbreak of Ich affecting all my tangs, my coral beauty, and my niger. Those are the visably affected ones. This is going to be a huge task sperating and treating these fish. :eek:
 
From the article above, all fish will have to be removed. Even if they are not visably infected, they still could be hosting.

I am keeping a close eye as I have not seen the ich return. All I seen was one spot. I may have gotten the potters out before the impregnated ich on the fish gave birth. If so, I dodged a huge bullet. After all, I just seen one spot on the blue face, and he appears to have flukes, so it may have just been that. Good news is I can treat the display for flukes using Prazipro. It may turn out OK. The Regal and Potters all are looking great in the QT. The Regal started eating last night, now if I can just get the Potters to eat.
 
Back
Top