azsoccerpop
New member
Remember I may not know what I am talking about here :hmm5: (truthfully)
The application of a dry bag I am referring to is to cover the top vents of the skimmer (assuming this is how you inject the o3). This scrubs off the o3 prior to entering your home and harming you or your furry low lying animals (because o3 is relatively heavy and stays low in rooms/spaces). Some people run a second skimmer that has been modified to not really skim, rather just mix in o3 and then they convert the whole skimmer cup to hold carbon to scrub the "air" leaving the top of the modded skimmer.
Some people have to have the second skimmer just because injecting the o3 into primary skimmer diminishes overall skimmate production; do you find this to be true? Or does your skimmer still perform what you would consider to be "normally" while injecting o3?
I have an Enaly ozone generator/air dryer at home I am contemplating implementing in my 175 build. I just don't know yet... :hmm4:
I also have seen use of media reactors for the best ozone implementation also noting that ozone into the skimmer reduces the skimate production. All theory though as I have not yet put the red sea on my system to test.