Interesting Zeolite/nutrient thread in SPS forum

Here, carbon granules work about as well as a zeolite:

Nitrification kinetics of biofilm on three types of filter media. He, Jie; Liu, Changfa; Wu, Yu. College of Life Science and Technology, Dalian Fisheries University, Dailian, Liaoning Province, Peop. Rep. China. Yingyong Yu Huanjing Shengwu Xuebao (2003), 9(5), 546-548.

Abstract

The nitrification kinetics and denitrification of biofilm on zeolites, carbon granules and sands were studied by detg. the concn. of COD, NH4+-N, NO2--N and NO3- -N. The results showed that the biodegrdn. of organism (expressed by COD) on the biofilm of three types of filter media followed the first-order dynamics and the biodegrdn. rates were: sands 0.0848 h-1, carbon granules 0.1187 h-1 and zeolites 0.1334 h-1, resp. The biodegrdn. of ammonia nitrogen followed zero-order kinetics and biodegrdn. rates were: sands -0.7743 h-1, carbon granules -0.9886 h-1, and zeolites -1.0714 h-1, resp. The biodegrdn. of nitrite nitrogen of the sands followed the zero-order kinetics and the biodegrdn. rate was -0.6057 h-1. There were denitrifying bacteria on the zeolites and the carbon granules when the concn. of nitrate nitrogen was high.
 
Introduction of some new materials for combined biological and ion-exchange wastewater treatment for ammonia removal. Weatherley, L.; Miladinovic, N.; Lopez-Ruiz, J. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Canterbury, N. Z. Progress in Water Resources (2003), 9(Water Pollution VII), 251-259.

Abstract

NH3 is a water pollutant which causes serious problems in terrestrial and saline receiving water. A classical soln. to the NH3 removal problem is biol. wastewater treatment which can be easily inhibited by toxic shock, pH change, low dissolved O2 concn., and low temp. Ion exchange materials have been used as an alternative to the biol. process; however, chem. regeneration of ion exchangers can be expensive, and if the influent NH3 concn. drops, desorption may occur resulting in increased effluent NH3 concns. When ion exchange and biol. oxidn. processes are combined, some drawbacks can be overcome. A literature review suggested only clinoptilolite (natural zeolite) has been studied in terms of biol. regeneration. In the research described, some new materials were evaluated in terms of biol. activation, including mordenite (natural zeolite); MN 500 (Macronet materials), and chem.-modified zeolite for NH3 removal from saline wastewater. Enriched cultures of nitrifying bacteria in a growth medium were established and used to obtain batch adsorption results on biol.-active materials. Uptake by biol. active, bacteria-free materials was compared. The same expts. were done for terrestrial and saline wastewater. For non-saline media, natural materials (zeolites) had overall better NH3 uptake and experienced highly biol. regeneration vs. synthetic MN 500. In saline media, synthetic material (MN 500) exhibited better NH3 removal vs. modified zeolite (ZZ).
 
Randy thanks. :)

From thes econd abstract: There were denitrifying bacteria on the zeolites and the carbon granules when the concn. of nitrate nitrogen was high.

Do you know what the conditions were (aerobic, anaerobic, anoxic) ?
 
Perhaps we both will agree soon on what I think happens, or a modification of it or on what you think happens.

I'll concede that all comments that I've seen in these articles indicate that the authors think it possible that ammonia bound to the zeolite can in some fashion be used to enhance ammonia uptake by bacteria. I'm not convinced that it is true, but it is a reasonable hypothesis. :)
 
Just a laymans thought on the comparison between zeolite and carbon, unlike carbon, zeolite pores are too small to house bacteria, the bacteria can only live on the outside, where they can be knocked off and skimmed, hence the nutrient export potential. Carbon, with bacteria actually in it, could become a nutrient sink, and eventually leach.
 
Quote - "How are the zeolites used in the Zeovit or similar systems?"
Don't actually have zeovit myself so cannot comment, I am just trying to gain an understanding before proceeding.
But I do know they are used with strong current, and have to be shaken every day to release bacteria.
It is after this "shake" that people claim to see huge polyp extension in their corals.
 
Randy,
I'm one month into the Zeo Systems. Aswasp said the zeolit is in a canister filter with water flowing into the bottom and exiting the top. Inside the chamber, at the bottom is a plate to support the media, then through that is an attached pipe which protrudes out the top. By lifting this pipe attached to the plate we are able to "lift" the media. Basically shaking it off without lifting the filter.
This is done by most once per day and it's suggested that the output from that filter be returned to the tank prior to reaching the skimmer.
EDIT: Also the recommendation is to have the feed pump cycle on and off in 3 hour time periods.
As you can imagine, when you do the mixing thing there are "things" being released from the media or just trapped duff which is then sent to the display. This duff is visable just as though you stirred up the bottom of the tank, not a 10 year old DSB but maybe like cleaning off a couple pieces of LR in your tank with a turkey baster. This duff is said to be by some, coral food.

After only one month I can not verify the huge polyp extension part though.

Steve U
 
Also the recommendation is to have the feed pump cycle on and off in 3 hour time periods.

Does that mean that it becomes anoxic inside of it?
 
I can't say if it would become anoxic in that three hour time period or not. My thoughts were that's what the method was meant to produce.

Those few that have run the system for a longer period find it not necessary once nutrient levels are reduced though.

Steve U
 
My understanding was it was supposed to be low flow three hours, high flow three hours.
Or did I get that wrong and it is high flow three hours, no flow three hours?
 
Pump on for three and pump off for three. The design of the canister should be such that the filter remain full when the pump is off.

Steve U
 
Well that's interesting. Not sure how big the cannister is but I would have thought it would have to go anoxic in that time.
Also, could there be a risk of sulpherication? ( or sulpher whatever-it's-called :) )
 
Boomer said:
Don't forget it will also be releasing things to the water other than just Na. There is a slow release of such things as, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn and Co.
When zeovit became popular few years ago I got the impression that this method mostly rely on controlled bleaching of corals to bring colours up, not only by lowering nutrients but mostly by controlled irritating of corals. :rolleyes: This impression stronger up year by year. ;) By this I donââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢t mean new products, like zeospur(2), where they use metals directly to ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œlighting colours upââ"šÂ¬Ã‚, but also basic zeovit-system (zeolites, food and bacteria). I thing this is the reason why one do not get exactly same results with vodka or sugar method, but I also do not thing that bleaching corals like in most zeovit-tanks is desirable. ;)

Randy Holmes-Farley said:
Also the recommendation is to have the feed pump cycle on and off in 3 hour time periods.

Does that mean that it becomes anoxic inside of it?
They claim that zeovit rely on heterotrophic bacteria and best environment for them will be changing environment from oxic to anoxic. :rolleyes:
 
Hab


Boom go back to your mine

Now why did I know you would dispute that :D. Hmm, you say IIRC, mine is in front of me ;) As I had said I have 4 zeolite text books, about a total of 1400 pages :lol: Two of them give the same sequence.

pge 169, Reviews on Mineralogy. Volume 4; Mineraology and Geology of Natural Zeolites, ed by F. A. Mumpton ( one of the zeolite Gods)

You may want to look into the works of Ames LL Jr, wh come to Clino, where most where published in the 60's, in the American Mineralogist.

If the clino has a higher affinity for K than ammonia then I would not expect much good.

I would agree on that and figured you would say that. Zeolites are a very nasty and difficult mineral to study.

So we are on the same page not all sequences are necessarily the same for x type clinoptilolite

4.1. Ion exchange and adsorption

Clinoptilolite and heulandite are low field strength zeolites for which the cation specivities.

Cs+ > Rb+ > NH4 + > K+ > Na+ > Li+ > H+, and Ba2+ > Sr2+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+ are predicted [11,
12]. Corresponding theoretical estimates yielded Ba2+ > Pb2+ > Cd2+ > Zn2+ > Cu2+ [16] butexperiments revealed Pb2+ Ã"šÃ‚¡Ãƒâ€"œ Ba2+ >> Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+. Using clinoptilolite-Na as reference
NH4 + > Pb2+ > Na+ > Cd2+ > Cu2+ ≅ Zn2+ [14] and Pb2+ > NH4 + > Cu2+ ≅ Cd2+ > Zn2+ ≅ Co2+ >
Ni2+ > Hg2+ [15] has been determined.


From ; http://www.krist.unibe.ch/pdf/Clinoptilolite.pdf


If you want to know about zeolites think Cs and nuclear ;)


Do you know what the conditions were


I would bet FAB (Facultative Anaerobic Bacteria)



Since you guys are dropping abstracts;

Rhodes University Electronic Theses Collection
TR 00-89
Author Mwale, Monica
Title Ammonia removal from water by ion exchange using South African and Zambian zeolite samples
Degree M.Sc. (Ichthyology) - Rhodes University, 2000.

Abstract One problem of intensive fish culture systems is the progressive build-up of toxic wastes such as ammonia. The possibility of improving aquaculture water quality using two kinds of zeolite is discussed. Zeolites are alumino-silicates whose framework allows them to exchange cations. Ion exchange has been demonstrated to be competitive with other methods of ammonia removal due to the high selectivity for ammonia exhibited by zeolite materials. In this study an unknown Zambian zeolite (identified as laumontite by X-ray diffraction techniques) and Pratley clinoptilolite (a South African zeolite) were tested under laboratory conditions and in a fresh water recirculating system. Ammonia cation exchange capacities (CEC) and suitable application rates for efficient water treatment were determined using the batch and column ion exchange procedures. Estimated ammonia uptake, the most important criterion used to assess performance of zeolite filters was strongly influenced by zeolite type, particle size, pre-treatment, regeneration and ion exchange method used.

Statistical analysis showed significant differences in average ammonia CEC values between clinoptilolite (14.94 mg g-1) and laumontite (2.77 mg g-1), with the former displaying a higher Na+ -> NH4+ exchange rate especially in the early reaction stages. This difference accords with the higher purity of clinoptilolite, 47% as opposed to 4.7% for laumontite, which makes it a better zeolite for ammonium removal. CEC increased linearly as particle size of the clinoptilolite was reduced resulting in a linear regression model (y = 18.29 Ã"šÃ‚¨C3.704 x; r2 = 74 %). Pre-treatment of clinoptilolite using 1N NaCl significantly improved the ammonia CEC of clinoptilolite. Overall performance of both the batch and column methods achieved after regeneration (18.3 mg g-1) was 25% higher than the estimated CEC values (13.0 mg g-1) for the unregenerated samples of clinoptilolite. Comparison of CEC estimates using Pratley clinoptilolite, showed that average batch CEC estimates were significantly lower than the column method estimates. The average ammonia CEC values estimated in a fresh water recirculating system (5.80 mg g-1 and 4.12 mg g-1 for the 0.7-1.0 and 1.0-1.4 mm particle sizes, respectively) were significantly lower than the column and batch estimates for the same particle sizes (P < 0.05). Some nitrite (NO2) and nitrate (NO3) build up was experienced probably due to the growth of autotrophs in the filters. Mass balance of nitrogen (N) for the three treatments of the fish trial (0.7-1.0 mm, 1.0-1.4 mm and the control treatment that had no zeolite in the filter) indicated that less that 10% of the N was retained for growth. It was found that 60 % of the NH4-N present associated with the soluble N was available for absorption by the zeolite filter or biological nitrification and that a total of approximately 22 % of NH4-N available was absorbed by clinoptilolite. The results indicate that the rate of nitrification can be deductively estimated by allowing a zeolite filter to become a biological filter. It is concluded that water treatment by ion exchange using natural zeolites, provides a reliable and efficient method for ammonia removal and appears to be a viable supplementary water treatment method for fresh water systems.



http://www.cape.canterbury.ac.nz/webdb/Apcche_Proceedings/APCChE/Data/974REV.pdf


Better than Clino on ammonia

http://www.zeoliteproducer.com/techpapers/Ammonia removal from wastewater.pdf


This one will give you and Randy a Buzz :D

http://www.minsocam.org/MSA/AmMin/TOC/Articles_Free/2001/Yang_p438-447_01.pdf

Something on a clino doing its job;

Based on the results of Chelishchev et al. (1973) noted above and others, clinoptilolite may be a useful ion-exchanger for Pb, Cu, Cd, Zn and Co in the final polished step of the tertiary treatment of industrial wastewaters. Studies of exchange between Na-Clino and various alkyl-ammonium cations have revealed interesting steric and ion-sieve properties that can be readily expalined on the bases for the Merkle-Slaughter Stucture (Barrer et al., 1976). Ions small enough to enter both channels fully replace Na+ (NH4+, CH3NH3+, C2H5NH3+, (CH3)2NH2+ and n-C3H7NH3+ ); those to large to enter the 8-ting channel but small enough tp penetrate the 10-ring channel are partially exchanged ( (CH3)3NH+ and iso-C3H7NH3+ ); and the largest ions are totally excluded ( (CH3)4N+ and tetra-C4H9NH3+ ). The n-C4H9NH3+ ion, which should penetrate both the 8- and 10-ring channels is only partially replaced. In this case ( and possibly in the case of (CH3)3NH+ and iso-C3H7NH3+ ), the free volume of the alkyl ammonium cation exceeds the total free volume of the channels and exchange is therefore limited by the stereo-chemistry for the sorbent and sorbate system


Randy

I'll concede that all comments that I've seen in these articles indicate that the authors think it possible that ammonia bound to the zeolite can in some fashion be used to enhance ammonia uptake by bacteria. I'm not convinced that it is true, but it is a reasonable hypothesis

That was the theory I also gave on the Zeovit thread to Alex and Gary. I also stated that GAC could do about the same thing as your abstract stated to include other porous media.

Your are not convinced ? Why not, some "bacteria" can do such things extracellular such as Cyanobacteria :D

Example ( Am I stretching it here ?)

Cyano's take organic phosphate, which is hydrolyzed outside the cell by extracelluar phosphatase and the phosphorus is taken up as orthophosphate.

Hi Gary :wavehand:

Where is Alex he should be here: D

I don't know where I/we are. It seems to be up and down, I have changed my view twice in the last couple of days. It is getting more confusing :lol:
 
Here is something about the anammox process. I have not read it yet.


http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/jun252003/1507.pdf


Also here is the abstract from the Nature article Jens is referring to:

Anaerobic ammonium oxidation by anammox bacteria in the Black Sea.

Kuypers MM, Sliekers AO, Lavik G, Schmid M, Jorgensen BB, Kuenen JG, Sinninghe Damste JS, Strous M, Jetten MS.

Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Department of Biogeochemistry, Celsiusstrasse 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany. mkuypers@mpi-bremen.de

The availability of fixed inorganic nitrogen (nitrate, nitrite and ammonium) limits primary productivity in many oceanic regions. The conversion of nitrate to N2 by heterotrophic bacteria (denitrification) is believed to be the only important sink for fixed inorganic nitrogen in the ocean. Here we provide evidence for bacteria that anaerobically oxidize ammonium with nitrite to N2 in the world's largest anoxic basin, the Black Sea. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences shows that these bacteria are related to members of the order Planctomycetales performing the anammox (anaerobic ammonium oxidation) process in ammonium-removing bioreactors. Nutrient profiles, fluorescently labelled RNA probes, 15N tracer experiments and the distribution of specific 'ladderane' membrane lipids indicate that ammonium diffusing upwards from the anoxic deep water is consumed by anammox bacteria below the oxic zone. This is the first time that anammox bacteria have been identified and directly linked to the removal of fixed inorganic nitrogen in the environment. The widespread occurrence of ammonium consumption in suboxic marine settings indicates that anammox might be important in the oceanic nitrogen cycle

Jens Kallmeyer said:
HI

Regarding the ammonium removal, has anyone ever given a thought to anaerobic ammonium oxidation, the "anamox" Process) I know that it is well known from Sewage plants and has been shown to occurr in Nature only once (Black Sea, along the Chemocline), but I can at least imagine that inside the Zeolite Grains something like this is occurring. The proof would be close to impossible, you would need to identify these ladderanes (already a nightmare in open water).
In all cases where this process has been identified, it was connected with ammonia enrichments, compared to the surrounding environment, and thats what we see in Zeolites

Best wishes

Jens

PS: this is the literature about its occurrence in Nature

Kuypers, M. M. M., A. O. Sliekers, G. Lavik, M. Schmidt, B. B. Jørgensen, J. G. Kuenen, J. S. Sinninghe Damste, M. Strous, and M. S. M. Jetten. 2003. Anaerobic ammonium oxidation by anammox bacteria in the Black Sea. Nature 422:608-611.
 
Back
Top