Large sps tanks...who doesn't use reactors???

The Saltman

New member
Hi guys,

Just wondering if any of you that maintain large sps systems do not run a calcium reactor?? How many of you use two part additives along with kalk?? Do you use a dosing device such as a Litermeter, etc?

I appreciate your response
 
Saltman,

An SPS dominated 180 will need a large supplementation of calcium. When my 180 was up, I had a Korallin 4002 reactor pushing a ton of CO2 into the chamber to keep up with the demand. I initially tried without the reactor for about 4 months (kalkwasser and 2-part additives with automatic dosing)...with no luck. Don't sell yourself short. If your going to keep SPS, invest in a reactor and a quality skimmer. Take your time and invest and plan for the critical components to maintain the system.

Good luck, and have fun planning and setting up!!!!:D
 
id think maybe and this may be a strech, maybe the only way you could get away with a two part addative is to use the diy two part. even then id think it would be much much more expensive than the reactor with a fully stocked sps tank.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9529758#post9529758 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kivalos
http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2006-08/totm/index.php

This man doesnt use calcium reactor and has very big tank.I think balling method is good to 150G aquarium, over this volume is more expensive than reactor

Agreed. His method of not using reactors was definitely not motivated by cost savings. I think instead he wanted to be able to adjust and fine tune dosing levels.

I think with enough money and time, any method will work. However, I think daily dosing by hand would be a nightmare in a large system.
 
I use Randy's 2 part on my 200 and several reefers with large tanks also co. Cost on the homemade 2 part is very low
 
I use a reactor. The main reason is it kept my tank's Ca and alk rock solid. I didn't have to do anything to maintain my ca level other than put new media in the reactor every 6 month. Even if dosing could be done. I don't think I would want to have to add it to the tank every day.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9530545#post9530545 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by JB NY
I use a reactor. The main reason is it kept my tank's Ca and alk rock solid. I didn't have to do anything to maintain my ca level other than put new media in the reactor every 6 month. Even if dosing could be done. I don't think I would want to have to add it to the tank every day.

My point exactly. When you get a large tank it takes a lot of time and effort. Saving that everyday is priceless. On the cost side if you look at the long term a calcium reactor is not that much more and if you have a large tank I doubt the $500 or so on the system to get going is going to break you. To me the side benefit is rock solid levels (dripping 24/7 vs once a day) and not having to test very often because once you dial them in it is truly only a matter of making sure there is still media in there.

2 part can work there is no doubt about it but time and effort involved with it make it a non-option for most of us.
 
id think maybe and this may be a strech, maybe the only way you could get away with a two part addative is to use the diy two part. even then id think it would be much more expensive than the reactor with a fully stocked sps tank.
 
I know that running BB will severely reduce your Alk uptake, as there isnt a giant bacteria source using up the carbon sources in the tank.

That said, I still dont know if you could get away without one if you had truely had a SPS forrest.
 
I have a 210 gal and a 55 gal running on the same sump/fuge. I drip Kalk from a 7 gal water container purchased a Walmart for just under $10 dollars. 2 tablespoons of pickeling lime and RO/DI water once a week works fine.

Also, I don't used a skimmer. I have 6-7" of sand in the fuge. In the sump I have heaters and the pump from my ASM g-1X skimmer (to provide airation to the return water. This system had been running since August, 2006. I did 50 gal water changes/week for the first three months. I then wen to every other week because I was constantly testing zero's on ammonia, nitites, nitrates, phosphates. I have not done a water change for a month (or so...) and I am currently only testing the following: ammonia (0), nitrites (0), nitrates (3), phosphates (0). (sailfert test kits). I add part one of a two-part solution to bump Alk when it drops. When I run out of part 1, I will start using baking soda instead.

I over feed my fish, like everyone else, except my sister:) I run the light on my fuge (150 watt cheapy work light from walmart with a 125 watt bulb) 24/7. I have no problems, and no worries.

Summer is no coming. My next project is to coil a bunch of pvc hose in an old compact refrigerator to use as a chiller. I will then go to Radio Shack and buy parts to make a thermostat/control unit to keep the temp constant.

This hobby is expensive, no doubt, but it does not have to be hard, complex, or prohibitivly expensive. I am a "coral for the masses" kind of guy. There is plently of info on these threads from plently of imaginative people who resolved my problems for me before I ever got into this hobby. They deserve many kudos. I don't think a single one of my methods or set-ups has not been done and covered by someone on these forums.
 
My 2 part has cost me 50.00 total for enough to last at least 2 yrs.. and the last 3 times Ive checked affected parameters they have been
ca--440
mg--1300.
alk--9.0.. all pretty solid.. That said Im not a big fan of the daily dosing and do plan a reactor when I upgrade.. end 07/ 08
 
Back
Top